“Up to press time last night the police had not officially disclosed the findings from the ballistic tests and when contacted Crime Chief, Seelall Persaud declined to comment.” -

How does this lead to a press article entitled “…Ballistic sources show no link to Fineman gang”?

What does Stabroek New intend to achieve with this article?

That woman is Madonna. She is holding the key to solving the crime.

You need real DEA personels contributing to the report. Who is actually contributing to the drugs report in Guyana?

Dem boyz seh, Talk half and left half

we all heard that saying as a child but guess what, you are not thinking in a Non-linear fashion as it relates to that saying. Lets suppose it was your neighbour’s dog who took the egg, now you hang your dog then later finds out that your dog wasn’t the one who took the egg on this occasion, what would you do? how would you feel? Don’t you think by investigating you would have stand a better chance of finding the culprit rather than assuming it was you dog. God forbid if you own a dog.

Thats just what is needed here INVESTIGATION.

Mackydog now you know that the ballistic tests are not linked to ‘fineman,’ you are scrambling for cover now. This is how you say the men were murdered, “The miners were being tortured since there is no evidence that the men died from gunshot wounds only by being sledged hammered in the head and by chainsaw.”

There is no evidence that a chainsaw was used on the men as follows:

“The source said everything that belonged to the men seemed to have been burned with them. “I don’t know if they used gasoline or what, but when I tell you that even chainsaw them man burn up you will understand that they were trying to burn everything…,” the source said.”

I think you should read carefully and stop making foolish assumptions that the men and ‘fineman’ had some sort of relationship. According to the owner his men were harden workers that would not stand silent to be robbed also, they had a shotgun or whatever rifle they had in their possession.

And if they had a relationship with ‘fineman’ as you said, the men would had planned for any retaliation from him knowing that he is a serious madman as you described him to be.

The Joint services are the only security forces around the two camps in the area. In addition, with the entire cordon off points, they are talking about and surveillance you mean to tell me that they did not know of the camp. The owner said his son and his men shared meat with the security forces before.

Why the Joint Services did not see the fire in the area that was burning the bodies of the men why did not the Joint services see the fire is they blind bats? Come on Mackydog you are not reasoning with children. Did you have a drink before you came here to respond to the comments on this site?

I observed you were commenting all over like crazy.

You surely cannot be this skeptical.

Finally, how can God be held responsible for evil, when evil is the product of volition? How can He control our free will in granting same? That would amount to a contradiction, wouldn;t it?

As Kreeft notes, sceptics discount God not because of the absence of adequate logic, but a soft head and hard heart.

It surely must be a scary thought that in death, you forever cease to exist. Do you really romanticize the idea of lying on your bed, dying gradually with loved ones around, feeling the chills of expiration, and then cease, not even with a little consciousness?

We do cause each other suffering, by choice or free will, so how should God be held responsible?

INXS, yes there was a reward out for Fineman, but even if that played a role in the killing, who will collect it now, and besides the reward is for his arrest and/or capture.

kmatt, the evidence that Fineman is/was in the area came from what the miners told the security forces, what Otis “Bun up” told the security forces before he died, and now a massacre in retaliation to Fineman nearly being caught and killed. What other evidence do you need, I guess when the joint services drag his fine dead body out of the jungle then we would have (not just evidence) conclusive evidence.