Dangerous dogs

For Full Access Login OR Subscribe Now - for as low as 25 cents a day


Last Wednesday morning a security guard on his way to work was killed by a pack of dogs which had escaped from their yard. Afterwards the animals turned their attention to the wife of a pastor who was bitten on her arms and leg before former minister, Dr Dale Bisnauth, came to the rescue with a stick, causing the dogs to retreat. Initial reports had suggested that some of the dogs, at least, were pit bulls, although this was denied by a relative of the owner, who said they were mixed breed. Whether any of them were pit bull mixtures, however, was not made clear. The matter is of some interest, since pit bulls – and by extension, pit bull cross-breeds – have acquired an unsavoury reputation in many countries for being ‘dangerous dogs.’

Even in this country they have gained considerable notoriety following attacks on people, including one earlier this year when full-blooded members of the breed bit two Tucville residents as well as two employees of the Guyana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. This was after a woman in the area – unbelievably – was alleged to have loosed them on a group of children who had been making a nuisance of themselves. Then there was the case last year of two pit bulls attacking a jogger in North Ruimveldt, and seriously injuring him.

Several countries, or in some cases, provinces within countries, have restricted pit bulls, including our neighbour Trinidad and Tobago. Similarly in the UK – reputedly a nation of dog lovers – they are one of four dog types which cannot be bred, sold or exchanged, the intention being that they will eventually die out. The other three breeds are little known in Guyana, although from their names two of them would seem to originate from this continent. The current British law covering the four specified breeds, cross-breeds from these and any other dogs “appearing… to be bred for fighting or to have the characteristics of a type bred for that purpose,” is the Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991. …..


MORE IN Editorial


Reader Comments »

The Comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.
  • We moderate ALL comments, so your comment will not be published until it has been reviewed by a moderator.
  • Our Comments are powered by the Disqus service. You may comment as a Guest by entering your comment and selecting "Post as". Optionally, you may sign-in using your Facebook, Yahoo or Twitter Accounts.

    Disqus' Privacy Policy can be read here. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.