Property evaluation must be under purview of Chief Valuation Officer

Dear Editor,
I  read  with  interest,  reports  in  several  daily  newspapers  that  the Georgetown  Mayor  and  City  Council  has  recommenced  its  property evaluation  exercise  of  the  Georgetown  municipality. It  was  always my  understanding  that  the  preparation  of  valuation  lists  for  any area  of  Guyana  was  by  virtue  of  Article  4  of  Chapter  28:04  –  the Valuation  for  Rating  Purposes  Act  under  the  direct  purview  of  the Chief  Valuation  Officer.  Nor  am  I  aware  that  the  Georgetown  City Council  ever  previously  undertook  such  an  exercise.

The  reports  states  that  the  mayor  and  city  council  are  empowered  under  the  Municipality  and  District  Council  Act  28:01  Article  202  (Power  to  levy  a  general  rate)  to  carry  out  this  exercise,  however  my  understanding  of  this  article  is  that  it  only  empowers  the  council  to  levy  a  general  rate  (which  is  a  rate  against  the  value  of  the  property  as  would  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  council’s  expenditures). Further  Article  204  of  the  same  act  goes  on  to  define  that  these  rates  (referred  to  in  Article  202)  shall  be  a  percentage  on  the  value  of  property  in  the  valuation  list.  This  valuation  list  as  previously  mentioned  has  to  be  prepared  by  the  Chief  Valuation  Officer  and  his  officers.

The  last  valuation  list  for  Georgetown  was  prepared  in  1996,  thus  an  updated  list  is  long  overdue  in  light  of  all  the  construction  activities  that  have  gone  on  since  this  period,  further  the  consultant  retained  by  the  Council  is  amongst  the  most  qualified  to  undertake  this  exercise,  however  if  this  exercise  is  not  conducted  in  accordance  with  our  current  laws,  it  can  be challenged  in  a  court  of  law  by  any  ratepayer  against  whom  these  new  rates  shall  be  levied.

Under  the  Urban  Development  Programme,  revaluation  exercises  of all  six  municipalities  were  conducted  and  are  in  various  stages  of completion,  however  this  programme  ended  in   June  2007 and  these lists  now  sit  on  the  Minister  of  Local  Government’s  desk gathering  dust. It  may  be  a  more  prudent  approach  for  the  Council  to  request  that  the  Minister  directs  the  Valuation  Division  to  complete  the  Georgetown  valuation  list  (which  is  currently  about  60%  completed),  after  which  they  can  levy  an  acceptable  general  rate  to  achieve  their  desired  tax  income.
Yours  faithfully,
David  Patterson