Toolbox

By Oluatoyin Alleyne

Dredge owner, Leonard Arokium has challenged the police to produce the eyewitness they say they have fingering Guyana’s most wanted, Rondell ‘Fineman’ Rawlins and his gang as being responsible for the deaths of the eight miners at Lindo Creek sometime last month.

Commissioner of Police (ag), Henry Greene was quoted in yesterday’s Kaieteur News as saying that the witness provided details to substantiate that the killings were carried out by the Fineman gang. Contacted by Stabroek News yesterday, Arokium said if the police have the witness then they should produce him. He said that if there is indeed such a person then that person should also be investigated as he/she may be an accomplice in the murders.

Leonard ArokiumAccording to the Kaieteur News report Greene said the eyewitness has given the police a detailed account of what transpired at the camp. He reported that they recently got hold of the eyewitness who said that the men were attacked by Rawlins and his gang. “They went there the night. Basically, they attacked the men. They tied them up, they cooked etcetera, then the next night they were shot and killed,” the commissioner was quoted as saying.

Stabroek News attempted to make contact with Greene and Crime Chief Seelall Persaud yesterday on the report but was unsuccessful.
Following the June 21 discovery of bones and skulls believed to be those of the eight miners, Arokium had accused the members of the joint services who had been in the area of carrying out the attack. The joint services have since strongly denied this.

Those who were killed at the site were Dax Arokium, Cedric Arokium, Compton Speirs, Horace Drakes, Clifton Wong, Lancelot Lee, Bonny Harry and Nigel Torres.
The police have since said that ballistics tests on the spent shells discovered at the scene found that they match one of the weapons that was recovered by the security forces from Cecil Ramcharran called ‘Uncle Willie’ and Robin Chung called ‘Chung Boy’ who were slain at Goat Farm during a confrontation with lawmen

Yesterday Arokium said that it seems all too convenient that the police would suddenly find someone who claimed to have witnessed the murders of his men. He questioned why this eyewitness had not reported the matter to the police from the inception instead of him having to travel to his mining camp and being the first person to know that his men were killed and burnt to bones.

Arokium also disclosed that on Saturday an Assistant Commissioner of Police, who heads a special unit in the force, and other officers visited his home and further questioned him, asking him if he wanted to recant anything he had initially said. He said he told them that he has been telling the truth all the time and has no reason to withdraw anything he would have said. He was then told by the officers the man who he had allegedly said told him that his son Dax and the lawmen in the area had among other things killed and shared the remains of a cow has denied ever telling him so. “They told me that the man is prepared to come and stand up in front of me and deny it and I just laugh because I know what he tell me and I telling the truth,” the man said. According to him the person who told him this was the watchman who was at a mining camp located some miles away from his camp and who had been sought by the authorities. The sharing of the meat suggested that the lawmen had been aware of where the Arokium camp was located.

And relatives of Compton Speirs reported yesterday that last Thursday the police visited their home with a bag of muddied clothing and asked whether they belonged to Speirs. Relatives said they told the police that they did not recognise the clothing and the police then asked for a statement on when last they had seen Speirs. They were uneasy about the fact that one of the lawmen did a detailed inspection of their yard. Relatives of Drakes also told Stabroek News yesterday that they were visited by  two constables on Friday and a statement was also sought from them.

Meanwhile, Arokium is questioning the government’s move to turn to Caricom for forensics help when his lawyers have been able to get UK experts to agree to come to Guyana. According to the man the Caricom countries “themselves need help, you go turn to them?”

The men’s relatives have secured the assistance of Forensic Science Service (FSS), a UK government owned company and through the law firm Hughes, Fields and Stoby, have written to Greene informing him of their desire to have the experts observe the conduct of any forensic examination

On Friday evening a statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs had said that it had received an official response from the US that “due to logistical and resource limitations” it was unable to fulfil the Guyana Govern-ment’s request for help with the murder investigations.

“Consequently, the Ministry of Home Affairs has already activated contingency arrangements at the bilateral level within Caricom together with other regional and international bodies for a forensic/pathology team to visit Guyana. It is expected that these contingency arrangements will bear fruit shortly,” the statement had said.

The statement had also said that the ministry appreciated the efforts of other stakeholders to expedite the arrival of an expert scientific team here, which appeared to be in reference to the efforts made by the Alliance For Change and the law firm, hired by the relatives of the dead men.

“The Ministry of Home Affairs wishes to reassure that the administration shares the concern of others in an equally emphatic manner and is exerting every effort to fulfil its responsibilities speedily in this matter as it has always done in the past”, the statement added.

In the wake of the third massacre in six months in June at Lindo Creek, pressure has been piled on the government to establish an independent probe particularly since the joint services have been accused of involvement in the killings.

Related Articles


You can follow responses to this article through its RSS feed.

Subscribe to our electronic edition or get home delivery!


Reader Comments

You can discuss this and other articles in our new community forums!


  1. La vie est bonne! CANADA says:

    The war of words continues…
    The truth is dead and buried…
    The scene was contaminated by careless inept police.
    No preservation of the forensic evidence as usual.

    • justice4all UNITED STATES says:

      A la contraire, the truth is obvious. When Law Enforcement engages in intimidating tatics with the suvivors of victims they are suspected or accused of killing, you do not need to look further for proof of thier involvement. That they can blatantly behave in this manner is proof positive that Guyana is a dictatorship with all the characteristics natural to Police States, regardless of the fact that the Government was voted in by a majority of the people.

      My criticism of the independent press is based on its reluctance or inability to investigate and report on these intimidating tatics by Law Enforcement that has become routine in Guyana today. Are they afraid? I mean the Police are visiting the relatives of the deceased, examing their yards, intimidating them to change their story.

      The visit by the police for the purpose of advising Arokium to re-think his position is illegal, intimidating, and would be done only in a nation where they are absolutely certain that there will be no outcry, no press scrutiny of these kinds of oppressive and repressive behaviour. How can the Stabroeknews and Kaieteurnews claim to be independent voices of the people when they report happenings like these as if they are consistent with democratic norms? How can the Stabroeknews be more concerned about a cultural festival than these rank and blatant abuses of the the very core of democracy? Where are the editorials lambasting these kinds of Police excesses? Or does the SN and KN believe what is being done is ok. Would there be silence if Constituents of the ruling regime was subjected to this kind of Police conduct? What is this nation devolving into?

  2. freetorun UNITED STATES says:

    this is a witness and he/she must be protected.

    • Twinkle Toe GUYANA says:

      This makes absolute sense. Good journalism freetorun. The others do not seem to get it. Twinkle Toe.

  3. Chemist BARBADOS says:

    I agree with Mr. Arokium. Let the police produce that eye witness. This is evolving into an interesting situation. (1) Com. Greene accuses FIneman and gang of robery at Aroima. (2)During that time apparently robbery/massacre taking at Lindo creek. (3) Com. Greene accuses Fineman and gang of robbery/ massacre at Lindo Creek. (4) Ask US Govt. for help in forensics which they deny. (5) Govt. have not considered family calls for forensic help from UK. (6) Police finally and conveniently say they can produce an eye with a detail account of what transpired.
    I think that Henry Greene, the officers involved and the eyewitness should be subjected to lie detector tests and investigations be carried out by an independent body. It appears that a “pseudo” closure by the Police is coming soon. We need to know the real truth. Unfortunately Fineman cant come forward and clear himself of this one.

    • stone80 CANADA says:

      didn’t you read about the hijacked minibus,when the occupants were told by the hijackers that the army killed some ppl.Make sense out of that for your self.Mr.Arokiam may have something to hide.

    • SUPERERRO UNITED STATES says:

      “I think that Henry Greene, the officers involved and the eyewitness should be subjected to lie detector tests and investigations be carried out by an independent body. It appears that a “pseudo” closure by the Police is coming soon. We need to know the real truth. Unfortunately Fineman cant come forward and clear himself of this one.”

      Is there really a ‘fineman’? $50 million is a lot of money anywhere, and that reward is out there for a few months now! It did not produce any results. WHY?

    • lady34 UNITED STATES says:

      fineman should contact newspapers by writing of phone to clear himself, just now you would hear skinny is doing stuff illegal that the police is doing

  4. bgsbny UNITED STATES says:

    …. after all the conjectures and speculation ,, two frames of reference comes to the fore with much light ,, 1] mass killing ,, and the fact that the thing called
    ” fineman ” was in the location ,, the killing is the first clue that brings the fineman into sharp focus ,, and the second is that he was in the area ,, they know that they would be identified ,, so the only recourse was to kill every one who “saw ” them ,,……..

    • Chemist BARBADOS says:

      If Fineman wanted to kill everyone who saw him, what was the motive for burning the camp and bodies apart from attracting attention to themselves. I am quite certain that was no small fire, weren’t the joint services in the vicinity at the time, didn’t they noticed anything strange like smoke in the area or maybe they expected the smoke. I spent extensive periods in the interior of Guyana, anything that unusual would have been noticed for miles on end.

    • Roula UNITED STATES says:

      If you are talking the truth, then let the UK expert come in!

  5. Twinkle Toe GUYANA says:

    Most times I do not quite understand these so called overseas journalists. Don’t they know that any witnesses available on both sides, cannot be divulged as it will be very dangerous.

    Come on fallas, write sensibly and understand the situation for a change.

    • lady34 UNITED STATES says:

      Twinkle Toe get real, and see what your law enforcement officials are doing… you thinks that’s ok, you ask yourself why was that eyewitness left alive after 8 died.

  6. Berkeley Van Bowen CANADA says:

    The acting Police Commissioner and Home Affairs minister have flip flopped on this case and no longer has an iota of credibility. More troubling is that they have no tangible vision to arrest the lopsided poverty which is adding fuel to the escalating crime and don’t seem to give a darn.

  7. Raj UNITED STATES says:

    Keep on it Mr. Arokium. Many admire and support your determination to get to the truth

  8. Incognegro UNITED STATES says:

    Eyewitness my behind, they said the area was hard to locate, plus troops are in the area. Why would the criminal gang go there, if they are out numbered and wounded?

    The witness can be protected, but they still need to bring forth that witness.

  9. rdman UNITED KINGDOM says:

    Stick to your guns Mr.Arokium don’t be intimidated,what i see here is the police are coming up with a witness,who would be well briefed and given information on how to counter attack you, and make you look like you’re lying.This tactics is mostly being used by spy agencies to silent legitmate witnesses and those that are speaking out against dictatorial governments.Mr.Arokium you have a strong case here,that’s why the government doesn’t want the British experts to come,they prefer Caricom which is more malleable.Don,t forget the evidence would be heavily tampered with,that’s why I think the U.S has declined the offer to come. All I said to you be careful.

  10. raulcedras TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO says:

    It is a sad state of affairs in that country. The beast is loose.



Comments Page 1 of 3123Next »

Leave a Reply

About Comments



The Comments section of this website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.

We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.

More articles in Local News