Toolbox

Dear Editor,

The recent death of Ranji Chandisingh brought many statements from many prominent politicans and personalities in this country. Let me extend to the family of the deceased, my earnest condolences. But I would like to really express some thoughts concerning Mr Chandisingh and his superficial communist beliefs which led him to betray the very ideas which he professed to believe in.

When Mr Chandisingh left the PPP to join the PNC government, he proceeded to issue statements slander-ing President Cheddi while justifying his move by stating that the PNC was following a course to build socialism and communism in Guyana. His statement at that time, was clear as daylight, in that he accused President Cheddi of selfish and opportunistic behaviour and of holding back the spread of socialism/communism in Guyana.

After working with Jagan for many years, Mr Chandisingh knew very well, without any doubt, that Cheddi Jagan was the most committed socialist/nationalist/communist the country, and indeed, the Caribbean had ever seen (even before Castro); he knew very well that not only was President Cheddi a true Marxist, but that he was the most modest, honest, non-corruptable person in the whole of Guyana. He knew very well that Jagan gave up the most for his socialist beliefs (loss of government in the 1960s) and stood like a real man, never giving in to cowardice and the sweet smell of success; he knew very well that Jagan would stay in the wilderness even if it was for all his life in order to preserve his beliefs in Marxism and a socialist mandate; he knew quite well  that for the cause of socialism, Jagan stood out like the Sphinx of Egypt and was world-recognized as a leading Marxist.

So why would Mr Chandisingh leave Jagan and walk to the other side, knowing full well that the cradle of Marxism was firmly rocked by Cheddi Jagan and knowing full well that the PNC government of the day was just blowing the trumpet of socialism to undermine the political positions of the PPP without building the foundations of a socialist state?

Chandisingh, in fact, left the PPP and walked towards the sweet smell of success because he couldn’t stand the wilderness, and it’s as simple as that.

He couldn’t stand the pressures which President Cheddi endured for all those years so he walked; he couldn’t deal with the spirited debates within the PPP and  Cheddi’s persausive eloquence in debating the ideas  of socialism because he thought that he was the leading master of theory and found out that the real master was Jagan. I remember my father explaining to me about Chandisingh’s defection and how it hurt him, and I remember him feeling sorry for “Ranji” because as he explained, “Ranji” was divorcing socialist theory from practice and thus had gone astray in trying to literally disband the PPP in his rush to “sweet success.”

Mr Chandisingh couldn’t stand the heat in the kitchen so he walked out and never came back from the dining room where he enjoyed the sweet smell of success until Mr Hoyte became President and moved the PNC away from the quasi-communist positions it previously held, and that was the end of “Ranji” as he became a relic of the past.

So, Editor, my contention is that the accolades which came in particular from certain PPP leaders are indicative of what the sweet smell of success can do to politicians who forget President Cheddi and the trials and tribulations which the likes of Chandisingh put that great man through.

The PPP leaders who heaped praise on Ranji Chandisingh recently should be ashamed of themselves, especially since they claim to be following the principles of Jagan.

The bottom line of the sequence of events which led to and encapsulated Chandisingh’s betrayal of President Cheddi is that “Ranji” betrayed himself and his own self-professed beliefs in the end because he always knew, to his dying day, that Cheddi Jagan was a righteous man and a righteous leader.

As far as I am concerned, “Ranji” will not even become a reference of political discourse in the future of our country’s development because he really was of shallow political skills, not able to see the visionary in Cheddi Jagan, who persevered in the end.

Yours faithfully,
Cheddi (Joey) Jagan (Jr)

Related Articles


You can follow responses to this article through its RSS feed.

Subscribe to our electronic edition or get home delivery!


Reader Comments

You can discuss this and other articles in our new community forums!


  1. kamla-w GUYANA says:

    yasuman71 IS Ms. N Jagan a resident of a communist country or capatialist?

    • Brandon Samaroo (Have we gotten our money's worth from the PPP after 17 years?!) CANADA says:

      Six, its out of the park, clean hit six runs…..

      Does she travel on a Guyanese passport or a yankee passport?
      Are her children flying on a GY passport or attending UG? i doubt that….

  2. Chuck Mohan UNITED STATES says:

    I believe that most of you, by your comments have missed the point in Joey’s article. His analysis regarding Chandisingh is accurate. Chandisingh, like others who left the PPP when the going got tough, were all opportunists. The thought that the grass was greener on the other side, but had a rude awakening when they found out there was no grass.

    It was totally hypocritical for the PPP to heap praise on this defector. Have they done this for other defectors? If not, why?

  3. Wally CANADA says:

    Where was Joey Jagan in the 1970s’ and 1980s’ when Chandisingh was helping to build Guyana. He was living it up in the United States and Canada. Going to expensive Universities payed for by his Father and Mother. Chandisingh risked his life many times for the Jagans in the 1950s’ 1960s’and this is the thanks he gets.



Comments Page 2 of 2« Prev12

Leave a Reply

About Comments



The Comments section of this website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.

We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.

More articles in Letters