Is this cost-cutting?

Dear Editor,

I have been following the Clico fiasco. While it is laudable that the Commissioner of Insurance would like to cut costs to protect policyholders’ interests, I find her actions inconsistent with her intentions. Why is Geeta Singh-Knight the former CEO who was at the helm of Clico (Gy) when disaster struck and who was responsible for making decisions in relation to its operations – to quote her “the buck stops with me”  – was employed by the Commissioner although she was suspended by the directors of the company, which continues to pay her  salary and benefits. Is this really cost-cutting?

As a matter of decency, why doesn’t Ms Singh-Knight do the right thing and remove herself? What is she doing there?

Yours faithfully,
Philip Chance