<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 249 inquests were pending at end of ‘07 – Attorney General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/stories/01/12/249-inquests-were-pending-at-end-of-%e2%80%9807-%e2%80%93-attorney-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/stories/01/12/249-inquests-were-pending-at-end-of-%e2%80%9807-%e2%80%93-attorney-general/</link>
	<description>Guyana News, Sports, Businesss and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:11:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: decanadianCarlVeecock</title>
		<link>http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/stories/01/12/249-inquests-were-pending-at-end-of-%e2%80%9807-%e2%80%93-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-84579</link>
		<dc:creator>decanadianCarlVeecock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=34622#comment-84579</guid>
		<description>A proper aGEING OF THE OUTSTANDING INQUESTS is so simple to prepare.

Why not done?

Do we know if any of these inquests date back to 1992?

So simple yet so complicated.
Let&#039;s see:
Year        Cases outstanding
1992           2
1993           1
1994           5
etc etc

Of course that would give rise as to why the much
older cases are still outstanding, and we all know the answer:
&quot; I just cannot tell&quot;

Next up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A proper aGEING OF THE OUTSTANDING INQUESTS is so simple to prepare.</p>
<p>Why not done?</p>
<p>Do we know if any of these inquests date back to 1992?</p>
<p>So simple yet so complicated.<br />
Let&#8217;s see:<br />
Year        Cases outstanding<br />
1992           2<br />
1993           1<br />
1994           5<br />
etc etc</p>
<p>Of course that would give rise as to why the much<br />
older cases are still outstanding, and we all know the answer:<br />
&#8221; I just cannot tell&#8221;</p>
<p>Next up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
