Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh tabled two bills yesterday in the National Assembly that seek to address the benefits that former Presidents and their spouses are entitled to after they would have left office.
The Former Presidents (Benefits and Other Facili-ties) Bill 2009 seeks to put into law the specific benefits and other facilities that all former Presidents are entitled to during the remainder of their lifetime
The benefits would include “payment of utilities at the place of residence, services of personal, technical and household staff, payment of health-care related expenses, for self and dependent members of family, full time personal security and Presidential Guard Service arrangements at the resident and taxable status identical to that of a serving President.”
A second bill the President Hoyte Pensions Bill 2009 was also tabled yesterday and this piece of legislation “seeks to make special provisions relating to the pension of the late President.” According to the Explanatory Memorandum of the Bill, “the widow’s pension payable to the widow of the late President Hoyte in accordance with section 5 of the Pensions (President Parliamentary and Special Offices) Act (Cap 27:03) is less beneficial than that available under section 3 of the Pensions (President) Act 2004 (Act No.6 of 2004).
This bill seeks to make special provisions regulating the widow’s pension payable to the widow of the late President Hoyte with effect from the date she became entitled to receive such pension.”
Meanwhile, earlier in the day Head of the Presidential Secretariat Dr. Roger Luncheon said that the implementation of these pieces of legislation would serve greatly to help clarify all ambiguous issues relating to the payment of pensions to former Presidents and even to their widows after they would have passed on.
When asked specifically about the situation relating to Mrs Hoyte, Luncheon said that the passage of these bills would help clarify this issue and he opined that their implementation will facilitate the former First Lady receiving more than she is currently receiving.




I only have one question. What took you so long?
I guess if she is receiving nothing, anything would be more than she is presently getting.
About time Ashmied……
oh what a set of hypocrites!
it is the public embarrassment of having not paid Mrs Hoyte that moved them to act
yes nelly so true.
It’s about time this issue is addressed, and why until now that a bill have to be tabled in parliment to address all presidential benefits, this should’ve been in place eversince, the the more i live the more i learn, how this govt is inept.
Well said. But how much longer will the wait be?
What a shame! I told you so. It has to be applied to a PPP member before Mrs. Hoyte gets what she so deserve. Thank God !! What a good Friday?
POLITICS BEING PLAYED AT ITS BEST!
they too wicked how long Mr. Hoyte died?
Jagdeo is preparing for his retirement, and they said Burnham was self serving. This is hillarious stuff
Ok, hmmmmm
This bill should have been in place 30to 40 years ago.Why the good PNC never did such?we must give credit where credit is deserved never mind i dont like PPP or PNC.
They don’t need not bill, it supposed to be automatically given.