Comments on: No cell phone with cop’s name found on dead wanted man – police

By: michael tannassee

michael tannassee — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:20:06 +0000

i see it like dis ,,,,,,

“in every rumour ,, there’s a lil bit ah truth in it !…..

By: michael tannassee

michael tannassee — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:17:49 +0000

jus like how dem en want fuh tell we now ,, dem gon tell we dem ????????

By: michael tannassee

michael tannassee — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:16:50 +0000

…an some ahdem duz rite tuh ,, but the world is not a globe ,, the lens is ,,, so we have to have them in the equation ,,

By: Mme Defarge

Mme Defarge — Fri, 22 May 2009 00:53:08 +0000

I agree, Georgia.

By: Mme Defarge

Mme Defarge — Fri, 22 May 2009 00:50:36 +0000

Delighted for you, Sandy. I wish you peace of mind and success.

By: darwinwasright(-132)

darwinwasright(-132) — Thu, 21 May 2009 22:46:49 +0000

… same ip address as above …

By: SandHurst First .....Back In Action...(Case Dismissed)

SandHurst First .....Back In Action...(Case Dismissed) — Thu, 21 May 2009 21:51:10 +0000

the case was dismissed my friend…out through the windows.

By: FREESPEECH

FREESPEECH — Thu, 21 May 2009 21:31:21 +0000

SN get you report right next time, don’t copy from others.
an apology is needed.

By: Bush T

Bush T — Thu, 21 May 2009 20:59:55 +0000

Dis ting about phone,mek me rememba the phone calls on the dead man’s phone.Ah think it was two phones.The matter ah taking about,is the Lindo Creek Massacre.Some soldier had a phone,that somebody find at Linden.Ah don’t have a good memory,but up to now,the Police,na saying nothing.Then they had something what that chap Lawyer ship back to America,and the Police seize it.Leh me stop,dem thing dis does confuse me brain.

By: sly25

sly25 — Thu, 21 May 2009 19:52:20 +0000

just as the probability exists that the phone didn’t belong to the bandit, the probability exists that it did. we shouldn’t be hearing about probability from the police p.r.o. we should be hearing about investigation. fine out who the owner of the phone is, establish when it was stolen and from there on you will know whoever stole the phone made calls from the date it was stolen, records can be obtained from the phone company. is it that the police don’t want to investigate or they don’t know how? unfortunately many people are of the opinion it’s the former rather than the latter.

By: muhannad ali

muhannad ali — Thu, 21 May 2009 19:38:33 +0000

just as the probability exists that the phone(s) were stolen, the probability exists that they weren’t, isn’t it? so how about some real police work. for example find out who the phone really belongs to, establish when it was stolen and from this all calls made after that date would mean that the person who stole it was using it, such data can be obtained from the phone company. just a thought.

By: GEORGIA ON MY MIND

GEORGIA ON MY MIND — Thu, 21 May 2009 19:16:03 +0000

I am sorry to say that I don’t believe this article today.
They are trying to cover things up and that is bad reporting, if the criminal was communicating with a traffic cop, you must look into why they were communicating and take it from there.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Thu, 21 May 2009 19:12:19 +0000

Ya right, some don’t know, it happens, how many cops here don’t shoot, then ask questions later, and find themselves with a law suit and thrown off the force later and/or sent to jail.

Look at those young men here in NA, cops shot many and lied that they had gun/s, never 4get AD and the rest here.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Thu, 21 May 2009 19:06:52 +0000

That’s why I said they (reporters) must get their facts straight, would reporters lie and place themself into a law suit,? they report lies, what the know it all people say,( he say, she say,) without proper investigation, if u know any tell me nah. lol.

By: malaika06

malaika06 — Thu, 21 May 2009 18:59:02 +0000

And some people like to give de mouth nuff liberty. They talk because they can

By: SandHurst First .....Back In Action...(Case Dismissed)

SandHurst First .....Back In Action...(Case Dismissed) — Thu, 21 May 2009 18:50:56 +0000

hahah…who they asking…the ghost? lol

By: concern

concern — Thu, 21 May 2009 17:44:33 +0000

the police motto is – shoot to kill and ask questions latta

By: Guy2000.

Guy2000. — Thu, 21 May 2009 15:49:37 +0000

how did your case go with the the people hope all was well with u,an that is over now so that u can move on with your life an be happy.

By: Guy2000.

Guy2000. — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:52:33 +0000

TAKE ALL THE PHONES TO THE PHONE COMPANY AN LET THEM SAY WHO IS THE OWERS OF THE PHONES, THAT HOW WE WILL GET THE FACTS .

By: Desi

Desi — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:43:32 +0000

No cell numbers found. Right.

By: catwomanmaneater

catwomanmaneater — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:32:24 +0000

stolen property.yes rite!!!!!!!!!!!

By: evileyes

evileyes — Thu, 21 May 2009 11:55:06 +0000

some po po lies and some news repotas r lax?
dont repotas lie too??
dont be like dem now….a lie is a lie

By: Cheryl Reporters, Get ur facts straight first.

Cheryl Reporters, Get ur facts straight first. — Thu, 21 May 2009 10:09:45 +0000

That’s why I constantly bloged, I never liked to jump to conclusion/s, I also bloged yesterday, “Reporters needs to get their facts straight, b4 printing, whatever is thrown out to us readers, causes us to blog about incidents that r sometimes untrue.

Some popos lies, some news reporters r lax in their investigations, quick for a print off, now KN is printing what was not checked, is KN at fault, or the popos untruthful again?.

By: SandHurst First .....Off to court

SandHurst First .....Off to court — Thu, 21 May 2009 09:41:18 +0000

….yes i was expecting a response like this from the police….how are we to know if it’s true or not…well Guyana is a small place and peter will tell tom who will eventually tell his best friend and so on and so forth…