LONDON, (Reuters) – The Court of Appeal ruled yesterday that a judgement strongly criticising the country’s  security services over the alleged torture of a former  Guantanamo Bay detainee should be published.

Earlier this month, the court agreed to disclose seven  paragraphs relating to secret U.S. intelligence material about  claims of abuse suffered by Binyam Mohamed at the hands of CIA  agents.

The ruling came after the High Court decided in 2008 that  the British government had to reveal all the evidence it held  against Mohamed except these paragraphs.

However, part of this judgement was removed after British  government lawyers saw a draft version and put pressure on the  court, arguing that it had gone too far and would damage  Britain’s domestic spy agency MI5.

Yesterday, the court agreed that both a draft and final  version of the judgement which included criticisms of the  British security services should now be published “in the  interests of open justice”.

MORE IN Archives


Reader Comments »

The Comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.
  • We moderate ALL comments, so your comment will not be published until it has been reviewed by a moderator.
  • Our Comments are powered by the Disqus service. You may comment as a Guest by entering your comment and selecting "Post as". Optionally, you may sign-in using your Facebook, Yahoo or Twitter Accounts.

    Disqus' Privacy Policy can be read here. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.