The Central Committee is the only body authorized in the PPP to decide on the presidential candidate

Dear Editor,

Mr M Maxwell lacks comprehension. See his letter in SN of 31.12.2010 (‘Democratic centralism gets the last laugh’). I explained in my recent letter on the issue of a secret ballot for the choosing of the PPP presidential candidate by the Central Committee (which Mr Maxwell apparently confuses with the Executive Committee, a lower body which is elected by the Central Committee) that in all three previous decisions of the Central Committee there was only one nominee and each nominee, as is the practice in every organization, approved the nominee by acclamation without a vote (‘The PPP has always conducted contested elections by secret ballot’ SN, December 24, 2010).

Which part of this simple statement did Mr Maxwell not understand when he incoherently concludes in his letter and in the process grossly misinterpreting me that: “Mr Ramkarran’s call for a secret ballot by the PPP Executive Committee (EC) to elect the party’s presidential candidate is a gigantic problem for him. For Mr Ramkarran participated in the previous processes where selections were made without voting and definitely without secret balloting. Mr Ramkarran wrote that the PPP EC met in August 1997 and chose Janet Jagan as the candidate after considering many names. I suspect this very same process was repeated for President Jagdeo. Mr Ramkarran has produced no evidence of secret ballots nor any ballots being conducted during any of the previous selections, including that of Cheddi Jagan. This is unequivocal proof that the PPP has always used a completely undemocratic process since 1992 to select its presidential candidate. A cabal of 15 members makes this decision without a vote. Mr Ramkarran willingly participated in this wanton autocracy. With the blood-spilling currently going on for the ultimate prize and many within that infamous committee wanting that prize, the authoritarian process will not change. Not now when some can benefit from that history of autocracy. Looks like the old joke called democratic centralism gets the last laugh.”

The Central Committee is the only constitutionally constituted body authorized to decide on the presidential candidate. The Executive Committee may discuss the matter beforehand and usually does. It may do so again.

Yours faithfully,

Ralph Ramkarran

Latest in Letters

default placeholder

The city council would need revenue to deal with vagrants

Dear Editor, Please refer to a letter which appeared in the Monday, June 27, edition of your newspaper captioned ‘City Hall should forget parking meters and build homes for vagrants and beggars’.

default placeholder

Dangerous demagoguery won in a European country again

Dear Editor, United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister David Cameron lost his job, after losing the UK referendum to leave or remain (the Brexit vote) in the European Union (EU).

default placeholder

Part of northbound lane of East Bank road deteriorating

Dear Editor, I would like to draw to the public’s attention the rapid deterioration of the northbound lanes of the recently constructed Section 2 on the East Bank Demerara Road.

default placeholder

Ogunseye should get Dr Thomas’s version

Dear Editor Based on a conversation I had had with Dr Clive Thomas after the 1992 elections, I asked Mr Tacuma Ogunseye to check his facts directly with Dr Thomas (‘Mr Ogunseye should get the facts from Dr Thomas,’ SN, June 23).

default placeholder

Guidelines for hiring teaching heads of department are archaic

Dear Editor, I note with worry and also much anger the replies of GTU President Mark Lyte and Mr George Cave in the print media recently regarding my letters in the press which highlighted the actions against dozens of teachers in the High Court, especially as they relate to my own preliminary promotion to Head of the English Department.

default placeholder

West Indies should be allowed to take part in Champions trophy

Dear Editor, Decisions have been overturned by those who made them on much more significant issues than which teams are excluded from a particular international sporting event or series of events.

default placeholder

The party is over

Dear Editor, With reference to the headline, ‘Cases being built against drug kingpins -US embassy official’ (SN, June 26),  this is the second instance in approximately two weeks that the US government, through a very high level representative, has showed its hand. 

default placeholder

‘I have never defended the PPP – only its right to govern’

Dear Editor, In his riposte titled ‘Cheddi Jagan withdrew the offer of a ministerial post to Clive Thomas’ (SN, Jun 22), Tacuma Ogunseye falsely attacked me. 

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: