Evidence points to no security risk in Petraeus affair

WASHINGTON, (Reuters) - Classified material kept by the woman who conducted an affair with former CIA Director David Petraeus predates their liaison and does not come from the spy agency, sources briefed on the investigation told Reuters yesterday.

David Petraeus

The finding appears to bolster assertions by both Petraeus and his biographer, Paula Broadwell, that their affair did not put national security secrets at risk – a central question hovering over the scandal that brought down one of the United States’ most respected public figures last week.

The CIA said yesterday it had opened an “exploratory” investigation into Petraeus’ conduct, building on the FBI’s probe. Law enforcement officials have said they believe the FBI investigation is likely to end without criminal charges.

The scandal has cast a spotlight on the private lives of some of the nation’s top national security officials.

The commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Marine General John Allen, now faces a Pentagon inspector general’s review of what sources describe as “flirtatious” emails with a Tampa socialite.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta ordered the military’s top brass to look for any gaps in ethics amid concerns officers’ lapses in judgment could erode public confidence in the military. Traveling in Bangkok, Panetta said he knew of no other military officials who have been drawn into the investigation.

Paula Broadwell

Petraeus and Broadwell have separately told investigators they did not share security secrets, and Petraeus has repeated that assertion to associates and a television reporter.

In his first public comments on the matter, Attorney General Eric Holder said on Thursday the FBI did not see any possible threats over the course of the investigation that were urgent enough to notify President Barack Obama or lawmakers until shortly before Petraeus stepped down.

FBI agents have found a substantial amount of classified information on Broadwell’s personal computer since they searched her Charlotte, North Carolina, home with her consent on Monday.

Sources briefed on the investigation said the documents date from before August 2011, when Petraeus took up his post at the CIA and the two started their affair. None of the material comes from the CIA.

As an Army reserve officer involved in military intelligence, Broadwell had a security clearance that allowed her to handle sensitive documents. However, she would still have to comply with strict rules that lay out how sensitive materials must be protected.

Broadwell’s security clearance has now been suspended. She could have it revoked and face harsher penalties if it is found she mishandled classified data.

Petraeus’ remarks notwithstanding, investigators said yesterday they had not ruled out the possibility that he passed on classified material to Broadwell. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

Broadwell, who has not been charged with any wrongdoing, has

made no public comment since the scandal erupted last week.

‘PRETTY CRITICAL INTERVIEW’

Some lawmakers have questioned why they were not notified of the probe until after last week’s presidential election.

Holder, at a news conference in New Orleans, defended the Justice Department’s handling of the case and its sharing of information with top Obama administration officials.

“After a pretty critical interview occurred the Friday before we made that disclosure, when we got to that point where we thought it was appropriate to share the information, we did so,” Holder said at a news conference.

Petraeus is due today to face lawmakers who are examining the September attacks in Benghazi, Libya, which led to the death of four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador. The attack has turned into a flash point between Obama and Republicans who accuse his administration of misleading the public in the days following the attack.



Join the Conversation

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

The Comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity. We moderate ALL comments, so your comment will not be published until it has been reviewed by a moderator.