Authorised persons from Scotiabank were not contacted for a comment

Dear Editor,

With reference to an article titled ‘New US tax compliance Act still to be discussed by bankers association‘ published in Stabroek Business of the Stabroek News of April 20, 2012, we wish to voice a few concerns over inaccuracies in the piece and the alleged source of information from Scotiabank.

The headline of the article is itself misleading since no contact was made with the Guyana Association of Bankers (GAB) for a comment in this regard. Scotiabank currently holds the Chair of the GAB, represented by the undersigned. The Secretary of the GAB is Ms Adele Farier, a senior officer of Scotiabank. Both Ms Farier and I are unaware that Stabroek Business was seeking information on this subject.

Further, references within the article to information provided and comments made by a Scotiabank “source” are uncorroborated and unsubstantiated. The writer of the article is aware of the persons authorized to speak on behalf of Scotiabank and neither was contacted for a comment.

Scotiabank wishes to offer the following corrections to information contained in the mentioned article:

US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA and not FACTA) is aimed at identifying US persons with financial assets outside the US.

Regulations pertaining to this Act and agreement between the US and foreign financial institutions have not been finalized at this time. This will be informed by whether this matter is addressed at the country level – that is if the country agrees to enter into an agreement with the US in this regard – or whether it will be at the financial institutions level, with financial institutions agreeing to observe the obligations under FATCA. Thus action by local banks will depend upon the finalization of the approach to be taken in this regard.

Scotiabank at this time is unaware of the possible penalty of ‘blacklisting’ by the US as reported in the article. As far as we are aware non-compliance could result in 30% withholding tax on US sources.

As a branch of a Canadian bank, Scotiabank in Guyana is aware of a legal requirement imposed to  report on interest bearing accounts for Canadian residents.

However, the bank does not offer
interest bearing account services in this regard.

The Guyana Association of Bankers has not decided on an approach with respect to FATCA and has issued no comment on behalf of the association in this regard.

We trust that a retraction in the form of prominent publication of this letter in your Business Page will be done soonest.

Scotiabank and the GAB consider ourselves amenable to the media and we ask that in future your writers channel their questions to the appropriate source/s to obtain accurate information.

Yours faithfully,
Amanda VML St Aubyn
Country Manager Scotiabank
Chairperson Guyana
Association of Bankers
Editor’s note

1. That the headline to the article was not inapposite is confirmed by Ms St Aubyn herself, who says above that the “Guyana Association of Bankers has not decided on an approach with respect to FATCA.”  

2.  The executive of GAB was not approached for a comment because Stabroek Business was already aware that the matter arose after the last meeting of the association, and could not be considered, therefore, before the next one was held.

2.  Most of the “corrected” information offered by Ms St Aubyn in the letter above, is contained in the article in question.

3.  We have noted for future reference the persons identified by Ms St Aubyn as being authorized to speak on behalf of Scotiabank, and will operate accordingly.

More in Letters

default placeholder

The Region Five Chairman has committed no infraction in relation to his official duties

Dear Editor, Last Thursday, July 21, the Region Five Regional Democratic Council (RDC) was once again prevented from conducting its statutory meeting.

default placeholder

Is the leader of the GPSU an employer because he sits on the Public Service Commission?

Dear Editor, I note the letter from Mr EB John – ‘GRA employees are not public servants’ – in SN of Saturday, July 23.

default placeholder

GRA employees are not public servants

Dear Editor, According to the media there appears to be a misconstruction of roles, respectively of the Chairman and Board of the Guyana Revenue Authority, and that of the President, GPSU; probably because in one instance the authors are uninformed of the Revenue Authority Act 13 of 1996, amended by 16 of 2003, Clause 2 (1) which reads as follows: “Functions of Governing Board (16 of 2003) “(1) The Governing Board shall be responsible for – “a)   subject to subsection (2) the approval and review of the policy of the Authority; “b)   the monitoring of the performance of the Authority in carrying out functions; and “(c)  the discipline and control of all members of staff of the Authority appointed under this Act.” In an apparent rush to personalise a difference of positions between the two parties much ado has been made of the quoted expressions of the Chairman, as distinct from the statutory authority of that office and the Board.

default placeholder

Fishermen from Guyana and Suriname are the ones most affected by piracy

Dear Editor, I write on behalf of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisation, the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation and the Suriname Fisherfolk Organisation ‒ Visserscollectief.

default placeholder

SOCU and SARU wield a political hatchet but masquerade as law enforcement agencies

Dear Editor, Just last week, I examined the causal connection between taxation and fear and economic decline in the context of the Guyanese economy.

default placeholder

To hang or not to hang

Dear Editor, To hang or not to hang has been a topic in Guyana, the Caribbean and much of the free world for several decades.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.



Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: