Dear Editor,
I wish to respectfully submit that the notion that the leadership of APNU, however derived, should not be dissolved into the leadership of the PNCR. Careful reflection by the parties concerned should reveal the prospective conflict of interest involved – a situation which appears to enjoy currency at this time!
Not being privy to the constitutional structure of the APNU one must resort to the literal connotation of ‘partnership’ – presumably of equals, operating in the truly democratic processes which APNU itself espouses at the ‘national’ level. Why and how then is it to be presumed that the future leadership of APNU must reside only in the PNCR? Why should there not be an alternative vision?
More immediately, however, the partners, and Mr Granger in particular, must reflect on the real possibility of differences in policy approaches recurring between the PNCR and other parties, individually and/or severally, posing a dilemma for the schizophrenic leadership role.
Additionally, it would be surprising if close advisors are not aware of the not unsubstantial disaffection with APNU’s leadership, not only within the shadow cabinet, but in more extended circles, including Linden, for example. There has been discussion overheard of the perception that communication skills could be more sharply honed, particularly to apprehend the nuances of some of the arguments of more experienced intellectual equals.
For the very reason that this ‘solider’ is still in the weaning stage of being a ‘politician,’ the latter may be well advised, that having reviewed identifiable challenges, to focus on the broader and more substantive responsibility of being Leader of the Opposition on behalf of the people who voted, rather than dissipate energies in managing the internal conflictions of a party currently in the throes of needed reconstruction.
In all the circumstances, one is not certain how apt is the descriptor of ‘straddling two horses’ at a time when the aspirant is still assiduously learning to excel in riding the critical one chosen by the supporters of APNU.
Yours faithfully,
E B John
