Warner falls before lunch to spoil Australia’s morning

HOBART,  (Reuters) - David Warner was run out on the stroke of lunch to leave Australia 97 for two on the opening day of the first test against Sri Lanka last night.

Opener Warner had crafted a half century to help Australia recover from the early loss of Ed Cowan and was set to lead his team through the first session until a calamitous misunderstanding with Phil Hughes led to his dismissal.

Warner looked to have called a single before changing his mind but Hughes, who will resume on 27 with Shane Watson, was already well on his way down the wicket, giving Angelo Mathews plenty of time to get the ball to the non-striker’s end.

Warner and Hughes had dug in reasonably well in the face of some tidy bowling from the Sri Lankans after Cowan had departed with just 18 runs on the Bellerive Oval scoreboard.

Chanaka Welegedera made the early breakthrough for the tourists when Cowan tried to pull a short delivery only for the ball to catch him high on the bat and carry to mid-on where Shaminda Eranga took a simple catch.

Australia captain Michael Clarke won the toss in bright sunshine but by the time Cowan and Warner took to the crease it was under overcast skies.

The Sri Lankan bowlers, described this week as the worst pace attack ever to tour Australia by former test bowler Rodney Hogg, were centimetres away from making a perfect start.

Cowan edged the second delivery of the day from Nuwan Kulasekara to the slips but Mathews was just unable to get his hands to it despite an athletic dive.

Opener Cowan faced just 16 further balls before departing for four, bringing Hughes to the crease for his third spell of test cricket.

Recalled on the back of good domestic form after the retirement of Ricky Ponting, the 24-year-old lefthander showed his intent with a couple of crisp fours early in his innings.



Join the Conversation

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

The Comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity. We moderate ALL comments, so your comment will not be published until it has been reviewed by a moderator.