Decency, morality do not evolve with time

Dear Editor,    

As society evolves, different phenomena display themselves, some of which are beneficial, some harmful, etc, and some which are amusing, depending on the viewpoint.

A recent phenomenon is the hippopotomouth (hippopotamus mouth!) which can be found almost anywhere. We see athletes exhibiting the h-mouth if a good point is scored, a wicket taken, a top product (or one claiming to be ‘top’) is hailed in an advertisement or a race won, among several manifestations. It would have seemed obvious that walking, running, standing around, etc, with the mouth at full stretch constitutes repulsive behaviour. Times change people’s perceptions as to what constitutes decency and acceptable behaviour; I recall that in my young days if you opened your mouth too widely you would be warned that a fly may enter it. The hippopotomouth is generally accompanied by a scream/shout/screech, etc. Remember that old saying? ‘Quiet speech is a mark of…’

Lest a reader may suspect that I am old-fashioned, be assured that I am that. I also believe that ‘old-fashioned’ characteristics of decency, morality, etc, do not evolve with time, except to deteriorate and the h-mouth is a glaring example of why not. Lest my modernist brother conclude that my stance is helplessly old-fashioned, I point out that this kind of behaviour has many levels of prices, some of them stunningly high. An example of the last is where a man who, as a result of a screech through an h-mouth, lost what appeared to be a very viable chance to become President of the United States of America, which is arguably the most powerful post in the world. (Remember. So if you thumb your nose at old-fashioned me, I say I am sorry for you.)

And if you think that is the only example I can quote, you are wrong. How about eight hundred thousand teenage pregnancies for the USA for 2008? Or was it nine hundred thousand? (So what is the difference between friends of a hundred thousand teenage pregnancies or so for a year for the USA?) Look at some of the TV programmes involving American teenagers and you will find the h-mouth, and the screech. Please excuse me for appearing to target the USA. I use the USA illustratively because they are such an open society, and information concerning them is so easily and readily available.

Decency is old-fashioned, and ignoring it can possibly cause profound changes. With the Americans and the Europeans in the forefront of advocating homosexuality to be a norm and legislating to give effect to that (example: Don’t ask. Don’t tell), same-sex marriages are a logical outcome. When the USA Supreme Court sits later this year on this subject, I have no doubt that it will legalise homosexuality, and when it does, look out for the consequences that will almost certainly descend upon them.

Every human being can look at the society in which he/she lives and try to draw conclusions by which we may guide our lives.  But decency is a topic to be explored further. As a first step can we please discard the h-mouth?
Yours faithfully,
Mujtaba Ahmad Nasir

More in Letters

default placeholder

The Region Five Chairman has committed no infraction in relation to his official duties

Dear Editor, Last Thursday, July 21, the Region Five Regional Democratic Council (RDC) was once again prevented from conducting its statutory meeting.

default placeholder

Is the leader of the GPSU an employer because he sits on the Public Service Commission?

Dear Editor, I note the letter from Mr EB John – ‘GRA employees are not public servants’ – in SN of Saturday, July 23.

default placeholder

GRA employees are not public servants

Dear Editor, According to the media there appears to be a misconstruction of roles, respectively of the Chairman and Board of the Guyana Revenue Authority, and that of the President, GPSU; probably because in one instance the authors are uninformed of the Revenue Authority Act 13 of 1996, amended by 16 of 2003, Clause 2 (1) which reads as follows: “Functions of Governing Board (16 of 2003) “(1) The Governing Board shall be responsible for – “a)   subject to subsection (2) the approval and review of the policy of the Authority; “b)   the monitoring of the performance of the Authority in carrying out functions; and “(c)  the discipline and control of all members of staff of the Authority appointed under this Act.” In an apparent rush to personalise a difference of positions between the two parties much ado has been made of the quoted expressions of the Chairman, as distinct from the statutory authority of that office and the Board.

default placeholder

Fishermen from Guyana and Suriname are the ones most affected by piracy

Dear Editor, I write on behalf of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisation, the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation and the Suriname Fisherfolk Organisation ‒ Visserscollectief.

default placeholder

SOCU and SARU wield a political hatchet but masquerade as law enforcement agencies

Dear Editor, Just last week, I examined the causal connection between taxation and fear and economic decline in the context of the Guyanese economy.

default placeholder

To hang or not to hang

Dear Editor, To hang or not to hang has been a topic in Guyana, the Caribbean and much of the free world for several decades.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.



Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: