MMA prohibits the spraying of herbicides to maintain its canals

Dear Editor,
I refer to two letters carried recently in the Stabroek News concerning spraying with herbicides to maintain canals in the MMA area (‘The MMA canals should not be cleared by the use of herbicides’ by Bramdeow Singh (February 9) and ‘Alleged use of herbicides in MMA/ ADA canals must be clarified’ by Hamilton Green (February 12).

For some time now, we have been deliberately choosing not to respond to letters in Stabroek News, especially those from Mr Singh. His letters are always incorrect, and Stabroek News, even though they can easily check with us, they choose not to do so.

In addition, we are usually too busy with our work. However, since the letter from Mr Green is an indication that people who do not know Mr Singh or the MMA are perhaps being misled we have chosen to clear the air on this matter.
For the record we would like to state as follows:

1. The use of herbicides to maintain the MMA canals is strictly prohibited; any contractor  doing so is terminated forthwith.
2. In the past there were only a few contractors who would hire others, our policy now is to employ as many persons as possible directly and usually the farmers themselves in the areas they cultivate.

3. There is no one who works at MMA that is contracted to clean canals.  None whatsoever.

4. Since 2008 when the MMA resumed responsibility for maintenance of the secondary systems the RPA has been integrally involved in the identification, award and inspection of the work of these contractors.

No contractor is paid without the RPA representative approving and signing off on his work.
The foregoing should also suffice in response to the letter from Mr Hamilton Green.

Yours faithfully,
Eustace Saul
O/C – Abary/Berbice
MMA Operations
& Maintenance

More in Letters

default placeholder

The Region Five Chairman has committed no infraction in relation to his official duties

Dear Editor, Last Thursday, July 21, the Region Five Regional Democratic Council (RDC) was once again prevented from conducting its statutory meeting.

default placeholder

Is the leader of the GPSU an employer because he sits on the Public Service Commission?

Dear Editor, I note the letter from Mr EB John – ‘GRA employees are not public servants’ – in SN of Saturday, July 23.

default placeholder

GRA employees are not public servants

Dear Editor, According to the media there appears to be a misconstruction of roles, respectively of the Chairman and Board of the Guyana Revenue Authority, and that of the President, GPSU; probably because in one instance the authors are uninformed of the Revenue Authority Act 13 of 1996, amended by 16 of 2003, Clause 2 (1) which reads as follows: “Functions of Governing Board (16 of 2003) “(1) The Governing Board shall be responsible for – “a)   subject to subsection (2) the approval and review of the policy of the Authority; “b)   the monitoring of the performance of the Authority in carrying out functions; and “(c)  the discipline and control of all members of staff of the Authority appointed under this Act.” In an apparent rush to personalise a difference of positions between the two parties much ado has been made of the quoted expressions of the Chairman, as distinct from the statutory authority of that office and the Board.

default placeholder

Fishermen from Guyana and Suriname are the ones most affected by piracy

Dear Editor, I write on behalf of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisation, the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation and the Suriname Fisherfolk Organisation ‒ Visserscollectief.

default placeholder

SOCU and SARU wield a political hatchet but masquerade as law enforcement agencies

Dear Editor, Just last week, I examined the causal connection between taxation and fear and economic decline in the context of the Guyanese economy.

default placeholder

To hang or not to hang

Dear Editor, To hang or not to hang has been a topic in Guyana, the Caribbean and much of the free world for several decades.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.



Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: