The PPP should take some credit for the present constitution

Dear Editor,

Mr Adams in a letter captioned ‘Not a PPP constitution’(SN, Feb 19) did a poor job at commenting on Dr Henry Jeffrey’s article. Mr Adams’ penchant for focusing on the trvial caused him to miss the salient point that was being made by Dr Jeffrey. The point is Guyana is not governed by the 1980 constitution.

In the constitutional reform process that occurred pursuant to the Herdmanston Accord, the constitution was changed by all the parties in the National Assembly at the time. Interestingly, the PPP was not disposed to reduce the power of the President which they criticised while in opposition.

It is important to note that during the constitutional reform process, the PPP/C was not only in power and had the power to make deep-rooted changes to the constitution, they were the most powerful actor in that process. Unfortunately, the PPP resented deep-rooted changes and only agreed to changes that suited them.

The extant constitution is therefore in the main a constitution with the imprint of the PPP. It is no longer the Burnham constitution. The PPP should take some credit.  Let’s call it the Burnham-Hoyte-Jagdeo constitution.

May I remind Mr Adams that the PPP boasts about the present constitution and contends that it is the most advanced in the Caribbean. Clearly, in the PPP’s mind it is their constitution.  I will not fight over the PPP’s claim for they are the breachers in chief of the constitution, and their very action makes Guyana a place where the relevance of a constitution diminishes daily.

But does it matter whose constitution it is?  Guyana needs constitutional reform to develop laws that will prevent the abuse of power regardless of which political party is in power.  One thing history has shown us is that we must not trust man with power for the songs they sing in opposition change while in government and vice versa.

Mr Adams must at a minimum get his facts right. There was no campaign to vote for the house and not the mouse in 1980.  If it is the referendum he is referring to, that year was 1978.

Yours faithfully,
Aubrey C Norton

Latest in Letters

default placeholder

The city council would need revenue to deal with vagrants

Dear Editor, Please refer to a letter which appeared in the Monday, June 27, edition of your newspaper captioned ‘City Hall should forget parking meters and build homes for vagrants and beggars’.

default placeholder

Dangerous demagoguery won in a European country again

Dear Editor, United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister David Cameron lost his job, after losing the UK referendum to leave or remain (the Brexit vote) in the European Union (EU).

default placeholder

Part of northbound lane of East Bank road deteriorating

Dear Editor, I would like to draw to the public’s attention the rapid deterioration of the northbound lanes of the recently constructed Section 2 on the East Bank Demerara Road.

default placeholder

Ogunseye should get Dr Thomas’s version

Dear Editor Based on a conversation I had had with Dr Clive Thomas after the 1992 elections, I asked Mr Tacuma Ogunseye to check his facts directly with Dr Thomas (‘Mr Ogunseye should get the facts from Dr Thomas,’ SN, June 23).

default placeholder

Guidelines for hiring teaching heads of department are archaic

Dear Editor, I note with worry and also much anger the replies of GTU President Mark Lyte and Mr George Cave in the print media recently regarding my letters in the press which highlighted the actions against dozens of teachers in the High Court, especially as they relate to my own preliminary promotion to Head of the English Department.

default placeholder

West Indies should be allowed to take part in Champions trophy

Dear Editor, Decisions have been overturned by those who made them on much more significant issues than which teams are excluded from a particular international sporting event or series of events.

default placeholder

The party is over

Dear Editor, With reference to the headline, ‘Cases being built against drug kingpins -US embassy official’ (SN, June 26),  this is the second instance in approximately two weeks that the US government, through a very high level representative, has showed its hand. 

default placeholder

‘I have never defended the PPP – only its right to govern’

Dear Editor, In his riposte titled ‘Cheddi Jagan withdrew the offer of a ministerial post to Clive Thomas’ (SN, Jun 22), Tacuma Ogunseye falsely attacked me. 

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: