The PPP should take some credit for the present constitution

Dear Editor,

Mr Adams in a letter captioned ‘Not a PPP constitution’(SN, Feb 19) did a poor job at commenting on Dr Henry Jeffrey’s article. Mr Adams’ penchant for focusing on the trvial caused him to miss the salient point that was being made by Dr Jeffrey. The point is Guyana is not governed by the 1980 constitution.

In the constitutional reform process that occurred pursuant to the Herdmanston Accord, the constitution was changed by all the parties in the National Assembly at the time. Interestingly, the PPP was not disposed to reduce the power of the President which they criticised while in opposition.

It is important to note that during the constitutional reform process, the PPP/C was not only in power and had the power to make deep-rooted changes to the constitution, they were the most powerful actor in that process. Unfortunately, the PPP resented deep-rooted changes and only agreed to changes that suited them.

The extant constitution is therefore in the main a constitution with the imprint of the PPP. It is no longer the Burnham constitution. The PPP should take some credit.  Let’s call it the Burnham-Hoyte-Jagdeo constitution.

May I remind Mr Adams that the PPP boasts about the present constitution and contends that it is the most advanced in the Caribbean. Clearly, in the PPP’s mind it is their constitution.  I will not fight over the PPP’s claim for they are the breachers in chief of the constitution, and their very action makes Guyana a place where the relevance of a constitution diminishes daily.

But does it matter whose constitution it is?  Guyana needs constitutional reform to develop laws that will prevent the abuse of power regardless of which political party is in power.  One thing history has shown us is that we must not trust man with power for the songs they sing in opposition change while in government and vice versa.

Mr Adams must at a minimum get his facts right. There was no campaign to vote for the house and not the mouse in 1980.  If it is the referendum he is referring to, that year was 1978.

Yours faithfully,
Aubrey C Norton

More in Letters

default placeholder

What is the relevance of race? We are all Guyanese

Dear Editor, After 50 years of independence ‘race’ seems as much a divisive construct as it ever was. Whatever political currency race held has been lost, evident in the underdevelopment of our nation these many years later.

default placeholder

This is our opportunity to shine

Dear Editor, Thank you for publishing my last letter on the subject of the Venezuelan refugees. Since then, I have seen Freddie Kissoon pick up the issue and Minister Harmon’s comments on it on TV and as reported in the Chronicle.

default placeholder

Guyana needs a Local Content Law

Dear Editor, Oil has been found in Guyana and optimistically production will begin in 2020. This offers Guyana the incredible opportunity of leapfrogging beyond the annual incremental 3-5 % economic growth to annual growth rates in the double digit range.

default placeholder

The Indigenous people and their land have been highlighted so politicians can become famous

Dear Editor, It’s with interest I read in the news these days about the leaders in Guyana playing the environmental card to the world.

default placeholder

Cancer is one of the greatest public health threats of the 21st century

Dear Editor, First I wish to applaud Mr Annan Boodram for his excellent and timely letter on alcohol and some of its major effects on this society, and the issue of alcohol in our culture.

default placeholder

There should be an investigation into why Thelma Rebeiro of Shulinab has not regained consciousness after four months

Dear Editor, The Amerindian Action Movement of Guyana (TAAMOG) is calling on the Guyana Medical Council (GMC) to conduct an urgent investigation to determine the reason or reasons why patient Thelma Rebeiro of Shulinab Village, south central Rupununi, Region 9 to date has not regained consciousness after four months following two surgeries for gallstones.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: