My decision not to renew GECOM contract was unrelated to PAC hearing

Dear Editor,

I am responding with much hesitation to the article captioned `Deputy CEO Calvin Benn opts not to renew contract with GECOM’, which was published in the Chronicle newspaper of April 23, 2014.

This hesitation is so because having made my decision not to renew my contract I hope to quietly enjoy my retirement away from any public spotlight. However, having received numerous telephone calls from relatives and friends I have decided to respond. The article purported to inform readers that I would not be renewing my contract. However, unlike the other newspapers which dealt specifically with the subject at hand, the reporter proceeded to link the matter with Public Accounts Committee (PAC) hearing of the Auditor General’s (AG’s) Report on GECOM for 2011. In so doing, the reporter conveyed the impression that I was responsible for the financial management of GECOM in 2011. I was not.

I am aware that the Chronicle Newspapers had reporters who were present at the hearing. Unlike other hearings that afternoon, that hearing had the presence of other reporters from all the local newspapers. The Chronicle reporter(s) ought to recall that, in my opening statement to the PAC, I clearly stated that I was not the Accounting Officer for GECOM for the Year 2011.

While I was being “hauled over the proverbial coals”, I pointed out that all the deficiencies in the 2011 AG’s Report took place under the stewardship of my predecessor. I was dealing with those matters not as the person Calvin Benn but as the Acting Chief Election Officer representing the affairs of GECOM and was therefore required to answer the queries of the PAC in that capacity. The newspaper article failed to make this distinction. Except for the questions related to the stolen $435,000 (not $500,000.00) all other queries and issues were directly related to the Office of the CEO for the period 2006-2011. In the circumstances, I think it is impertative that I respond to the aforementioned newspaper article, less an impressionable reader comes to the conclusion that my decision not to renew my contract was influenced by the issues emanating from the hearing of the PAC.

Yours faithfully,
Calvin Benn

More in Letters

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning:

Most Read This Week

  1. The medical school sign on the Buddy’s building

    Buddy’s Pool Hall, Night Club closed after business falls

  2. Barry Dataram

    Who is to blame for Dataram escape?

  3. Lakeram Kewlachand

    Gangaram man takes his own life

  4. Wayne Isaacs (New York Post photograph)

    Guyanese-born cop charged with killing unarmed civilian in NY

  5. The Rio Inn at Forshaw and Oronoque Streets

    Teen shot dead outside Rio nightclub

  6. Courtenay Griffith’s home in Lodge that is earmarked to be demolished.

    City to tear down 52 derelict buildings

  7. Barry Dataram

    Absent Barry Dataram found guilty of drug trafficking

  8. The bus in the trench along Homestretch Avenue.

    Bus ends up in Homestretch trench

  9. Ryan Sergeant

    Youth killed, friend wounded after nightclub shooting


Recommended For You