Lanka says no to ICC reforms

Sri Lanka has formally decided to oppose the India-led proposals to overhaul the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) governance structure and revenue share model, casting doubts as to whether there are enough votes for it at an ICC meeting in Singapore tomorrow.

South Africa and Pakistan have already voiced opposition to the plan which will see India, Australia and England control world cricket. For the proposal to succeed one of the three holdouts: South Africa, Pakistan or Sri Lanka will have to change their position. The West Indies and the other full members of the ICC have already signalled support for the new proposal.

In a statement on Wednesday evening, Sri Lanka Cricket said its executive committee has decided to reject any plan that could jeopardise the former world champions’ rights and privileges as a Full Member of the ICC.

The signals were clear on Tuesday, Sri Lanka’s Independence Day. A section of the Lankan media voiced the island’s sentiments, even calling the fight against ICC’s plans, “a war”, according to NDTV.

An unnamed SLC official warned that unless they take a stand now, cricket will be destroyed if power is bestowed on a few countries. “They might even change the rules of the game to fit them. We have past examples. The bouncer rule was brought in by the then powerful England and Australia and wiped off West Indies cricket. In recent times, we know how India’s resistance has stopped DRS (Decision Review System) becoming law. There is a great danger lurking behind these proposals,” the top Lankan official added.

On Wednesday, the SLC statement said: “Sri Lanka Cricket wishes to announce that the executive committee met with all the stake holders, past captains, past presidents and secretaries of SLC and the sports ministry representative to discuss the ICC Revised Working Group Proposals at the Auditorium of the Ministry of Sports. The Revised Proposals put forward by the ICC, the views of the legal advisory committee and the financial evaluations were taken into consideration and discussed in detail. The views of the executive committee were expressed based on the above. It was explained at this meeting that the SLC executive committee was firmly of the view that all endeavours should be made to safeguard the current rights and privileges of Sri Lanka as a Full Member of the ICC. All present at this meeting were in unanimous agreement with the decision taken by the executive committee to oppose the Revised Proposals.”

NDTV said that the Sri Lankan stance will be a massive setback for Board of Control for Cricket in India, Cricket Australia and England and Wales Cricket Board which are pushing for a new structure that will give executive control and a bigger revenue share to the troika. India, England and Australia are hoping to push their proposals through when the ICC meets in Singapore on Saturday, but need the support of at least eight out of the 10 Full members.

On Tuesday, Cricket South Africa made itself clear in a press statement. “While we are engaged in discussions with the ICC and other Full members, including the BCCI, to find an acceptable way forward, we have not and will not consider deals that compromise our key principles and integrity. This is a difficult time for global cricket and attempts to mislead and create confusion are not welcome,” said CSA president, Chris Nenzani.

“CSA vehemently denies any notion of deals being made with any other party. On the contrary we will seek to uphold good governance and our professional approach to find solutions to the current proposals being considered by all the Member Boards.

“We have carefully considered the proposals and we have declared that we will engage further with the ICC and other Members to try and reach any consensus ahead of Saturday’s ICC Board meeting and that position still stands,” explained Nenzani, according to NDTV.

BCCI, in particular, wants members to accept the proposals. The Indian Board stands to gain the most from the revamp of the revenue model, with its share of revenue jumping  from USD 63 million to USD 766 million.



Join the Conversation

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

The Comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity. We moderate ALL comments, so your comment will not be published until it has been reviewed by a moderator.