Date First Published February 6, 1987

THE June 13, 1980 car bomb-blast death of well-known politician and historian Dr. Walter Rodney has been thrown into prominence again with the recent surfacing of Gregory Smith in Cayenne, French Guiana.

Smith was named by Walter’s brother Donald as the man who supplied a ‘walkie-talkie’ which exploded and killed Dr. Rodney, a co-founder of the opposition Working People’s Alliance (WPA).

As part of its probe to determine the circumstances of Dr. Rodney’s death, ‘Stabroek News’ reporter Sharief Khan interviewed Gregory Smith in Cayenne by telephone from Georgetown, and we will be following up the story.

This is Mr. Khan’s interview with Gregory Smith, also known as William Smith and Cyril Johnson.

Smith said he was Cyril Johnson.

SK: “We have heard about an interview that you gave to CANA Radio two weeks ago in which you said you were the Gregory Smith that has been implicat­ed or allegedly involv­ed in the death of Dr. Rodney in 1980.”

Smith: “Yes and no… William is the name… William is the correct name.” (Smith went on here to explain that the name Gre­gory Smith was his ‘call’ name and that his correct name is William Smith).

SK:          “So to get it clearly, are you the person who spoke with the CANA Radio?”

GS: “That’s right.”

SK: “Did you in fact say that you were the Gregory Smith that was allegedly involved or implicated in the death of Dr. Rodney?”

GS: “Ah… (pause) ..I don’t like the words that you are using.”

SK: “Well, how would you like to put it then?”

GS: “OK. Ah…involv­ed in the accident.”

SK: “Involved in the accident which resulted in the death of Dr. Rodney?”

GS: “OK. Fine.”

SK: “Would you like to elaborate on what you meant or what you mean by an ac­cident? Could you ex­pand on that for me?”

GS:         ‘Ah… (pause) …

Look…It is very, very difficult…to…to      ex­plain… the truth is that we were engaged in… you can say rebellious activities. (Rodney and I) and a lot of other people and I am the only one who seems to be left in it. The point is I have decided not to talk to any­body else unless,..if you can get hold of copies of the statement that Donald (Rodney) used when the incident oc­curred, then I will be able to tell you, as you read it to me, I shall be able to fill the ir­regularities

SK: “I don’t have the statement but I remember seeing it since 1980 and in that statement, he said that on the night in question he uplifted something in a brown paper bag from your home in Russell Street and that was the thing that ex­ploded, killing Dr. Rod­ney. Did you in fact give him something for Dr. Rodney?”

GS: “What thing did he say it was?”

SK: “He said it was a ‘walkie-talkie’.

GS: “OK. Fine that he had given me to repair?”

SK: “No. That you had made.”

GS: (Sounding surpris­ed). “Made?”

SK: “Yes – made… manufactured.”

GS: “I think I must have gotten it wrong or you must have got it wrong.”

SK: “What basically is your side of the story of whatever might have happened?”

GS: “1 was given the task of modifying a ‘walkie-talkie’ to trigger these devices. All the equipment was given to me by the people concerned.”

SK: “Would you like to name those people?”

INVOLVED

GS: “At this point in time I would say it was given to me by Donald and Walter. Other people were involved but so far, as far as I know… anyway, I don’t want to implicate these peo­ple. “

SK: “So you would prefer not to name them apart from Don­ald and Dr. Rodney at this time?”

GS: “That’s right.”

SK: “OK. So you are saying that it was a ‘walkie-talkie’ that they gave you to be modi­fied?”

GS: “Of course”

SK: “Do you have any explanation on why that thing explod­ed? If Donald’s state­ment is true?”

GS: “Maybe it explod­ed because they did not adhere to instruc­tions.”

SK: “What kind of instructions did you give them’?”

GS: “Instructions as to safeguard them­selves…whoever is do­ing the installation.”

SK: “So you are say­ing that you gave them this thing and they were supposed to have installed it somewhere?”

GS: “That’s right.”

SK: “Do you know where they were sup­posed to have installed it?”

GS: ‘What I was told is that they have to disrupt some telecom­munication equipment to stop communication.

You know these junc­tion boxes on the road that they use to con­nect the telephone lines? I was told that they had to disrupt a few of them.

SK: “You are saying it exploded because they failed to carry out your instructions.”

CIS “1 suppose so. I can’t say for sure. It could (have gone) off for a number of other reasons.”

SK:          “How old are you?”

GS: “I was born on June 5, 1946.”

SK: “What have you been doing since you left Guyana?”

GS: “Working.”

SK: “Have you ever been back to Guyana since you left?”

GS: “Ah (long pause) 1 would prefer to leave that alone.”

SK:          “On what date did you leave Guy­ana?”

GS: “On the 7th of July” (1980).

SK: “Did you leave from Kwakwani by army helicopter?”

GS: “1 did not.”

SK: “How did you leave? Would you care to say?”

GS:         (Chuckling). “When the time comes I would say.”

SK: “Which brings me to the other question …Would you be pre­pared, if requested, or if asked to do so by the Guyana Police, to come back to Guyana to testify at any in­quiry into what hap­pened?”

TREASON

GS: “Man, 1 have to evade this. I’ll tell you why. Because of being in the armed services, regardless of being un­trained, being just a technician; it doesn’t matter what – the mo­ment you lift a finger against the government that you swear to pro­tect (it could be term­ed) treason. Isn’t this so? Do you know what is the penalty for trea­son?”

SK: “It’s death.”

GS: “Of course.”

SK: “So you are say­ing you might be charged for treason if you come back?”

GS: “They ain’t got no might about that. Let me tell you some­thing. I joined that ser­vice and was badly treated.”

SK: “Which service? Is this the GDF?”

GS:         “Of course…I joined as a private in 1975.”

SK: “When did you leave the service?”

GS: “Hold on, hold on. At the end of that year, they made me a Lance Corporal. I went to England to study electronics and they made me an act­ing corporal. I came back and I was ask­ed to construct a unit for them… for the army …the unit would have cost them a bun­dle. After this unit was finished, after working day and night by myself, day and night, coffee and cigar­ettes…I worked, I worked, 1 worked. When it was finally completed, my boss was patted on the shoulder and told what a fine job he had done. During that time they called all the brass to look at this unit. I was standing at the door and all I kept doing was saluting. When that was done, six months after they made me an acting ser­geant.

That was a joke — a complete joke. You can check it out.”

SK:          “What kind of unit was that?”

MOTIVATED

GS: “It was a sort of surveillance unit. I would not go into de­tails because that would put me…anyway you can’t go deeper than you are…but that’s the way the army goes – they take you in, they promise you a whole load of crap and then they keep pushing you around, you can’t get promotion because you don’t have the party card. (They tell you) you better go and join the party, you can’t (become) an officer be­cause you are not poli­tically motivated a whole heap of rub­bish.”

SK: “What was your number in the army when you left?”

GS: “4141.”

SK: “When did you leave the army?”

GS: “That is another story again. You can say that I was rebel­lious, I was wayward because of the treat­ment that was handed out to me. I (went to work) when I felt like it (and 1 had hoped this would have allowed them) to bust me and throw me out. Nobody bothered, so why should I have bothered?”

SK: “At the time you left were you station­ed at the Marine Wing at Ruimveldt?”

GS: “You can’t say stationed because I wasn’t there. But I worked there.”

SK: “You said you studied electronics in England. Who sent you there?”

GS: “The army did.”

SK: “What year was that?”

GS: “The very next year, six months after I joined.”

SK: “Did you ever go to North Korea on behalf of the army?”

GS:         “No. I never went.”

SK: “Did you at one time live with Gwen­doline Jones at 40 Russell Street?”

GS:         “Yes, you can say that.”

SK: “Did you have a telephone number 53622 installed at that home?”

GS:         “Yes, you can say that.”

SK:          “Did you go through the normal channels of applying to Telecoms to get that number or did anybody help you to get that number?”

GS: “As a matter of fact I did not apply for that number. The lady did, and she got it.”

SK: “Did you in fact have tape-recording equipment attached to that telephone?”

GS: (A long pause). “Well, you can say yes, because, as it is, (because) of what 1 was engaged in I could not have run the risk of people taking messages for me when “I am not there.”

SK: “Would you care to say what business were you engaged in?”

OVERTHROW

GS: “I was involved in a system to over­throw the Guyana Gov­ernment that been pissing on the people’s heads for the longest while. You can write it just as it is. I just fed up of going round and round and round.

You see I don’t want to implicate some de­cent people in this whole business. To be going round and round is wasting time:

Look, there was a plot to overthrow the Govern-ment. There was an accident and every­body run. Everybody just run and hide like old women. A bunch of .. — ass revolution­ists you got. They pre­fer to see their chil­dren roaming the streets hustling. They prefer to remain failing to make ends meet.