- Published: September 28, 2008
- Permalink
- Printer Friendly Version
- Email This Article
- Discuss this Article (8)
- Next Article in this Section
Toilet bowl politics
There is nothing which illustrates better how politics has contaminated every human activity in the Co-operative Republic than Minister of Education Shaik Baksh’s response to the offer by the AFC to donate some materials to Santa Rosa Primary School. No, said the Minister, the party would not be allowed to donate to the school unless it got permission from the school management, the education department, the regional administration and ultimately the Ministry of Education. One need not be very familiar with how things operate in these 83,000 square miles to know that this bureaucratic barrier might constitute a greater challenge to the unwary donor than trying to scale the wall of a Norman castle while defenders stand ready with their boiling oil on the ramparts.
Now the Minister could have left it at that, but being a man of greater frankness than discretion, he then went on to say that his ministry accepted assistance from international bodies and non-governmental organisations, but it “would not allow the AFC to use this as a political agenda for their political objectives and goals to go into these schools and do what they want.” In other words, that is the prerogative of the PPP alone (albeit in its governmental incarnation). One can easily conjure up an image of the barons of the ruling party clustered around the long table in Fortress Freedom House discussing the best tactics to repel a perceived assault on their political demesne, an assault infuriatingly masked as a gift offering of toilet bowls, no less.
It will be recalled that this latest untimely political outburst had its origin in a human tragedy: the death by drowning of little Tenesha de Souza in a pit latrine at Santa Rosa Primary School. In the immediate aftermath of that unthinkable accident, Minister Baksh had told this newspaper that the ministry would not be phasing out pit latrines in schools, since these were an internationally accepted means of sanitation disposal. One presumes that he had meant to include the words ‘right away’ in those comments because we reported him as going on to say that it would be done eventually, although it would be costly and would take some years to accomplish. He referred to pit latrines being still in use in many parts of Guyana, especially in those areas where water was not readily available.
It is perfectly true, of course, that it will take time, as the Minister says, to replace pit latrines in all schools, particularly in areas where there is a water problem. However, the immediate question related to what action his ministry was prepared to take in the case of Santa Rosa Primary, which has 700 pupils and actually has two flush toilets installed already which are reserved for teachers.
Where that specific issue was concerned, Minister Baksh gave absolutely no indication that his ministry would at this time be replacing the pit latrines used by pupils at Santa Rosa, and in fact seemed to subsume that school under his general comments about pit latrine replacement.
His remarks inevitably produced a torrent of criticism, and by Monday he was holding an impromptu press conference to backtrack on his previous statements, and say that under the Education for All-Fast Track Initiative Programme (EFA-FTI) Santa Rosa Primary had been one of 15 schools identified to benefit from a part of the project. Each of the beneficiaries would receive $1M, and in Santa Rosa’s case this would be used to build additional classrooms as well as sanitary blocks. The money had already been handed over, he said.
Before Minister Baksh ever addressed the media on Monday, however, the Santa Rosa Primary School Parent Teachers Association had already made a public appeal for assistance to build a sanitary block at the school, and the AFC had responded with an offer of toilet bowls and pipes, among other items. The Minister’s public disclosure about the money available from the EFA-FTI project, therefore, came only after this, while Chairman of the Santa Rosa PTA Mark Atkinson, told this newspaper that the money had only been made available after Tenesha’s death, and that there had been promises before but that the funds had not been handed over. If nothing else, therefore, the AFC appear by their offer to the school to have greased the wheels of the bureaucracy.
However, Mr Atkinson explained to Stabroek News that the money from the project would be insufficient to build the sanitary block as well as extend the school, and they still needed more donations; in addition, they lacked technical skills and would be grateful for assistance in that department. The parents of the pupils in Santa Rosa, of course, don’t care two hoots about politics where this matter is concerned; their only interest is in the safety of their children. Mr Atkinson was quoted as saying: “This is not a political issue. My only concern is for the 700 children at the school… We asked for assistance and if the AFC or anyone comes forward with assistance we would accept it.”
The PTA does not “control the school,” grumbled the Minister in response on Monday, and permission would still have to be obtained. One can only observe that the AFC is not undertaking to provide an entire sanitary block, merely make a donation towards equipping it. So here we have the government discerning a political agenda in some toilet bowls and pipes; all one can say is that this is the stuff of which comedy routines are made elsewhere.
The administration, of course, has now publicly advertised its priorities for the nation, viz, that it will allow nothing to potentially undermine its hold on what it perceives as its electoral base, even when there are humanitarian issues involved. If, for the sake of argument, this had happened in a school in an undisputed PNCR constituency which the PPP had no hope of turning, the government would not have stood in the way of a PNC donation, and in a practical sense, probably could not have done so either. Nowadays, as things stand politically, however, the PPP/C needs the help of the Amerindian vote to get into office, and the Arawak vote in Region One is a major element in that. The government wants to be seen, therefore, as the sole agent capable of conferring benefits on the Amerindians; most donors other than international ones − which will probably have to operate through the government in any case − are looked on with suspicion.
Had the Ministry of Education quietly approved the AFC donation, there probably would have been very little fuss and no political consequences for the government, despite the fact the AFC made public its donation. The reaction of the Minister of Education, however, will have focused the attention of Region One residents on the ruling party’s modus operandi. Furthermore, the ministry could be in for Round Two if the Santa Rosa PTA accepts the AFC donation in the face of an official block. No doubt, the government will try and put pressure on the PTA, or some members of the PTA, not to accept it; if it succeeds, or if it directly withholds permission for the PTA to take it, then it inevitably would have to provide sufficient funds to build the sanitary block. However, the political damage would already have been done.
What it appears the PPP/C has yet to learn is that it has been elected to govern first and foremost.
As such, therefore, humanitarian considerations take precedence over raw power politics.
Comments
About Comments
-
We thank all readers who have contributed to this site since its relaunch. This section of the website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and we hope that readers make full use of it as many have already done.
- The comments section is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
- In recent weeks a large proportion of the comments posted have contained attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity. Comments of these types will be deleted.
- Comments which contain gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity will be struck.
- We reserve the right to edit/delete comments for length, any libel and taste. We moderate all comments so be patient while your message waits to be approved.
- Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.
8 Responses to “Toilet bowl politics”
Got something to say?
More News
- Press freedom around the world - 1 Comments
- Sub-regional initiatives - 0 Comments
- Exit wounds - 3 Comments
- Letters man - 1 Comments
- National embarrassment - 6 Comments
- What Obama’s victory hasn’t changed - 6 Comments
- Mr Obama and Cuba - 10 Comments
- Archaic laws - 1 Comments
- Responding to the new American presidency - 0 Comments
- Better than cure - 0 Comments
- Payroll recovery - 1 Comments
- Semantics - 2 Comments
- Bloody October - 2 Comments
- Tears - 1 Comments
- The Obama win - 10 Comments

coolieman
on September 28th, 2008 9:54 amThe govt is right to block anything political from schools, the AFC should donate some toilet bowls to parents who have handicapped kid and cant afford one, Stabroek needs to stop the spin for the AFC
[Reply to this]
Pantha
In reply to the above comment on September 28th, 2008 6:12 pm:Better yet, donate one to you so you can consign your letters there, rather than show off your astonishing lack of common humanity.
[Reply to this]
Sarkar
on September 28th, 2008 12:21 pmIT’S LIKE THE DRUG PUSHERS PROTECTING THEIR TURF!!!.
Boy! looks like I’m psychic… See my comments on yesterday’s “Slippery Slope”.
Here’s an extract… “The way I see it, politicians in Guyana do not understand that progressive planning is for the betterment of Guyana and not “WE will not prepare a nice solid foundation for ANOTHER political party to benefit if we lose the next election”.
GUYANA will benefit, not it’s next group of leaders!!! GUYANA MUST COME FIRST…. PERIOD!!!!!!!!”
THIS IS MY TURF, I WILL DO WHATEVER I WANT IN MY OWN SWEET TIME!!!
PLEASE!! No reference to Forbes, that is past…. move on! Learn from mistakes, act on the present to make way for a better FUTURE!!
Remember the Berbice River bridge? They waited for the elections to come around, they waited to ensure that they will not be ‘putting in foundations for another political party’.
Sadly, in the end GUYANESE suffer from this sort of NARROW MINDEDNESS that may continue to plague this unfortunate nation for generations to come. It seems that we are forever doomed to serfdom.
[Reply to this]
drumup_change
on September 28th, 2008 2:00 pm………..this attitude is what is killing guyana………the government better be prepare to tell the guyanese people whats to come because no one will buy bad death and lesss and less grant would be coming guyana way………
[Reply to this]
A380100
on September 28th, 2008 3:43 pmPetty, that is the only word that comes to mind. Government for the people does not.
[Reply to this]
AMAR NAUTH
on September 29th, 2008 6:06 amguyana and the ppp is fast becoming another cuba and a fidel castro.look at the way they do things here this speaks for itself.The national tv today seems to be owned by ppp and bharrat jagdeo.no other political party can express themselves.if you are not ppp you are not allowed to do business in guyana.i hope the foriegn doners will do proper investigation before they donate to guyanese and make it clear to the media that it is a foriegn donation and not a ppp one or jagdeo one.the foriegn doners should also seek to have every cent donated to guyana account for since the ppp has proven itself to be an extremely corrupt government.coolie man wake up before its too late.a child should persue knowledge not knowledge persueing a child.thank you.
[Reply to this]
Ricardo
on October 5th, 2008 5:31 pm“The Minister’s public disclosure about the money available from the EFA-FTI project, therefore, came only after this, while Chairman of the Santa Rosa PTA Mark Atkinson, told this newspaper that the money had only been made available after Tenesha’s death, and that there had been promises before but that the funds had not been handed over.”
This is exactly what I was saying all along that, there are “Projects along with funds allocated or budgeted for Education and other humanitarian issues but if there are no incidents then the funds are used for and by the Administration or the Ministry in direct control of same to do as they see fit. Whether its flying around the world on “Government” or Personal business.
I wonder what G$1,000,000.00 can actually accomplish in building materials.
Minister Baksh thinks he is constructing more Pit Latrines?
The AFC, JFAP, TUF or any other Political or non-political should not be debarred from contributing to any community because the PPP/C or the Government says so.
The PPP/C is trying to make the students and Santa Rosa Community feel that Toilet bowl donations may buy them.
We are free moral agents and have the right to choose at the end of the day.
[Reply to this]
bbuckman
on October 7th, 2008 2:07 amyou cannot donate to the state without it permission is a norm across the world.
i donate to a private individual without their permission.
i try to buy dinner for a young lady{she was hungry} at demico and she refused
[Reply to this]