Long delays in the recognition process have weakened the trade union movement

Dear Editor,
The foundation of a trade union to represent workers in any undertaking is recognition by the employer. Employers and workers were at liberty to agree on terms of employment, which were included in individual contracts of employment. Where the workers of an employer organized themselves into a trade union, such trade union could made a claim for recognition from that employer.
In the Trade Union Recognition Act No 33 of 1997 section (20), it is stated:

 “(1) where only one union has applied under section 18, the Board shall carry out a membership survey to determine the extent of support which the union enjoys on the date of the application among the workers comprised in the appropriate bargaining unit; 
“(2) where it appears to the Board from the results of the survey that the union is supported on the date of application by at least forty per cent of the workers comprised in the appropriate bargaining unit, the Board shall certify the union as the recognized majority union for that unit; 

“(3) In carrying out any membership survey under this Act the Board shall satisfy itself, by whatever means it deems appropriate, as to the authenticity of any documents submitted.”

The new system sought to redress the problem of recognition. There is now a Trade Union Recognition Board whose duty it is to ensure that a trade union with more than forty per cent of the workers comprise an appropriate bargaining unit as members in good standing, and is certified as a recognized majority union for that bargaining unit. Where a trade union is duly certified as the recognized majority union for workers in a bargaining unit, the employer must recognize that trade union as the recognized majority union and the employer shall, subject to the Trade Union Recognition Act, treat and enter into negotiations in good faith with it for the purposes of collective bargaining.

A recognized majority union or an employer who fails to comply with the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine of twenty-eight thousand dollars and, in addition, to a  fine of five hundred dollars for every day the breach continues until the employer has complied with the provisions.

Some of the most contentious areas of industrial relations relate to matters such as the recognition procedure for gaining bargaining unit rights, which has been criticised by trade unionists like me.

In Guyana where there are legal requirements for recognition there have been serious complaints by trade unions about long delays in the recognition process. These have caused a great number of claims for recognition, which has weakened the trade union movement.
Yours faithfully, 
Sherwood Clarke

Comments

About Comments

    We thank all readers who have contributed to this site since its relaunch. This section of the website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and we hope that readers make full use of it as many have already done.
  • The comments section is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
  • In recent weeks a large proportion of the comments posted have contained attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity. Comments of these types will be deleted.
  • Comments which contain gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity will be struck.
  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments for length, any libel and taste. We moderate all comments so be patient while your message waits to be approved.
  • Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.

One Response to “Long delays in the recognition process have weakened the trade union movement”

  1. Milne Seymour GUYANA

    on August 30th, 2008 9:07 am

    The recognition process has very little to do with the weakening of the trade union movement. It has alot to do with the question of leadership. I think that this is a area that Mr Clarke should focus on.

    [Reply to this]

Got something to say?





Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.


More News