Toolbox

There is no conflict of interest

Dear Editor,

With regards to a letter appearing in KN of 21.7.08 by Anthony Vieira captioned ‘Winston Murray, not David Patterson deserves credit,’ first let me express my disappointment with KN for allowing a letter to be published without checking whether the allegations contained are factual. Mr Vieira previously attempted to level some of these allegations against me, however Stabroek News to their credit sought to confirm the allegations before publication, and having determined that they were incorrect, declined to publish the inaccuracies. Of course my opinion of the writer remains unchanged. I consider the statements made against me to be libellous.

Mr Vieira’s understanding that as a quantity surveyor I am “doing Government valuation contracts on an ongoing basis,” which in his opinion places me in a position of conflict of interest while serving on the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is totally incorrect. Despite being one of only two chartered quantity surveyors presently operating in Guyana, I have been unable to secure a contract with the government for over ten (10) years and counting. Where is the conflict of interest if I do no work at all for the Government of Guyana? This is a blatant lie being peddled by Mr Vieira and it is remarkable that a man who claims to be a great researcher would not even have the common sense to lean over at one of our parliamentary meetings and ask me frontally if this is true. I have to say that I am surprised that as a television news publisher and Member of Parlia-ment, this is the type of loose and irresponsible reporting that Mr Vieira produces. It’s this type of utter rubbish that jeopardises the good work of all media practitioners and causes ‘eye-pass’ to come to them. Maybe Mr Vieira may want to resuscitate his now defunct commentary programme to inquire why important quantity surveying services are being performed by unqualified technicians, which results in hundreds of millions of dollars being squandered from government coffers annually.

Mr Vieira omitted to mention that as a member of the PAC he has not, up to the time of writing this letter, been attending meetings for this current sitting of parliament (October 2007 to present). There is no Hansard produced at these meetings, but only minutes, and these minutes will nail Mr Vieira’s lies being peddled against me. In this committee we examine the Auditor General’s Report for all the government departments; the information relating to the Ministry of Health and the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation exclusive procurement policy with New GPC was contained in both the 2004 and 2005 reports, so any credit for unearthing this illegal practice should go to the Auditor General’s department. If he is upset that I, via Stabroek News, brought this matter to the public domain, I can only recommend that he attend PAC meetings, then use his unfettered access to the media to highlight any corrupt or illegal practices.

The AFC remains the only party perfectly placed “to condemn the numerous and flagrant conflict of interest situations existing in this country” since we continue to be guided by the rule of law, and a higher moral code. None of our members has turned their backs or compromised him/herself.

It is important that lies and half truths are exposed and I make no apology for my response and consider this attack to be a part of some bigger sinister programme being hatched against me and the party which I proudly represent, the AFC. Try again, but some place else.

Yours faithfully,
David Patterson, MP

Comments

About Comments

We reserve the right to edit/delete comments for length, any libel and taste. We moderate all comments so be patient while your message waits to be approved.
Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.
We recognized that the registration process was troublesome to some users. So now in addition to being able to fully register and subscribe with a username and password, you can also comment on the articles by simply entering a name and email address. If you are a frequent commenter, you will want to login so you don’t have to re-type your name and email address everytime you make a comment.

3 Responses to “There is no conflict of interest”

La vie est bonne!
on July 23rd, 2008 8:43 am

Patterson you surely have your head in the sand when it comes to “appearances of conflict of interest. In a democracy if there is any appearance of a conflict when in government. The member should recuse himself from any such committee. This is the transparent way of doing things.
However, under this regime anything goes.

[Reply to this]
La vie est bonne!
In reply to the above comment on July 23rd, 2008 1:09 pm:
I forgot to note that the AFC had better not yell conflicts of interest when this regime does same or worse things.
Shame on the AFC!!!

[Reply to this]
Berkeley Van Bowen
on July 23rd, 2008 9:03 am

The AFC continues to live up to its reputation for being a vacuous party. We are reminded that they were voted into parliament by PNC supporters who were outwitted by the PPP.

[Reply to this]