- Published: September 5, 2008
- Permalink
- Printer Friendly Version
- Email This Article
- Discuss this Article (7)
- Next Article in this Section
Neighbours decline to testify against each other
Two neighbours who assaulted each other had their case dismissed on Wednesday because they refused to offer evidence against each other when they appeared before Magistrate Melissa Robertson-Ogle at the Georgetown Magistrate’s Court.
Thirty-three-year-old Sherman Monroe of 28 Holmes Street, South Cummingsburg and Seon Lewis, 26, of the same address pleaded not guilty to the charge of unlawfully assaulting each other.
Lewis stated that on August 29 at their Cummingsburg home he was outside in the yard praying when Monroe passed and jammed him. Shortly after an argument ensued and it was because of his mother’s displeasure about the situation, that she started raving and this alerted a police officer who was nearby. The two were subsequently arrested and charged.
Monroe admitted to jamming Lewis but he stated that it happened accidentally.
They both stated that they were never desirous of the matter reaching the court and they did not wish to bring any evidence against each other. The case was then dismissed.
Comments
About Comments
-
We thank all readers who have contributed to this site since its relaunch. This section of the website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and we hope that readers make full use of it as many have already done.
- The comments section is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
- In recent weeks a large proportion of the comments posted have contained attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity. Comments of these types will be deleted.
- Comments which contain gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity will be struck.
- We reserve the right to edit/delete comments for length, any libel and taste. We moderate all comments so be patient while your message waits to be approved.
- Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.
7 Responses to “Neighbours decline to testify against each other”
Got something to say?
More News
- Accused gunpoint robber remanded, alleges police beating for confession - 26 Comments
- Man found with two forged US$100 notes - court told - 8 Comments
- Battered Bush Lot man released from hospital - 1 Comments
- Man denies uttering forged $3.7M cheque - 0 Comments
- Alleged wife tormentor charged with stabbing husband - 43 Comments
- ‘BV man’ pleads guilty to killing 15-yr-old friend after rum spree - 11 Comments
- Two men granted bail, third remanded on separate ganja charges - 2 Comments
- Knife-point robbery accused granted bail - 3 Comments
- Larceny by bailee accused put on $100,000 bail - 1 Comments
- Larceny by bailee accused put on $100,000 bail - 0 Comments
- Teen stole relative’s $12,000 gold chain - 6 Comments
- Two juveniles sent to NOC for breaking into Corriverton house - 2 Comments
- Corentyne man gets two years for stealing engine boat - 2 Comments
- Cops conspired to put man on drug charge - 34 Comments
- ‘Anaconda’ remanded on 12 counts of murder in Bartica slaughter - 51 Comments

decanadianCarlVeecock
on September 5th, 2008 9:04 amWhat abot Court costs?
They wasted the Court”s time and should pay some costs.
[Reply to this]
Melainie
In reply to the above comment on September 5th, 2008 12:35 pm:what happen to those that were prosecuting the case they had to speak to them because if they were doing their jobs they would have been well aware of these two people feelings about the case.
[Reply to this]
Ankoko
In reply to the above comment on September 5th, 2008 12:43 pm:Seem to me that is the police who institute the charges wasted the Court;s time. I gather from this article that these young men from the beginning did not want a ‘court story’.
For the policeman: what about that part of policing which allows the police to encourage amicable and peaceful settlement of disputes before instituting charges.
I have said in this blog that I remember the current police commissioner as a uniformed police officer who worked in the hinterland and spent a lot of his personal time seeking to diffuse situations and encouraging residents to live in peace. Maybe he needs to have some of that taught in the training programmes!
[Reply to this]
Hugo
on September 5th, 2008 10:17 amOk.
[Reply to this]
kabaka
on September 5th, 2008 10:53 amNeighbourly Love ! What the world needs more of!!
[Reply to this]
UltimateW
on September 5th, 2008 3:55 pmI wonder how that argument went on … ‘ Ah prayin man don’t jam mi or ah gon bus you head. ‘ ha .
[Reply to this]
Arnold
on September 6th, 2008 3:08 pmSometimes due to the daily pressure of survival, we have to discharge our feelings or rage on someone many times without malice inside………..
If we do reach the courts and don’t want to testify against each other, the Magistrate should put the parties to Shake Hands and a warning (…) jail the next time…….
The HOLY BIBLE says Love thy Neighbours as Yourself…….
[Reply to this]