Toolbox

Ravanlee Chan case

Two policemen deny assaulting boy

Two policemen who were accused of assaulting a 10-year-old child earlier this year made their second appearance at the New Amsterdam Court on Monday and pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Reports are that between January 1 to 3, 2008 Corporal Godfrey Playter and another officer, Elroy Williams unlawfully and maliciously assaulted the child, Ravanlee Chan so as to cause him grievous bodily harm.
Playter and Williams are being represented by attorneys-at-law, Ramesh Rajkumar and Michael Baird respectively. Magistrate Chandra Sohan adjourned the matter to a later date.

It is alleged that the beatings stemmed from a report that the child’s neighbour made that he stole $6,000 from her on January 1. The child and his father [who died of natural causes shortly after], were taken into custody at the Sisters Police Station, East Berbice.

They were kept in separate cells. The father, who had told this newspaper that he heard the boy screaming during the night while he was being beaten, was released the following morning.

The child remained in custody at Sisters until January 3 and was taken to the New Amsterdam Central Police Station in handcuffs.
From there Ravanlee was escorted to the NA Hospital where he remained under police guard until January 5. Relatives observed that he had “marks of violence about the body.” He was discharged from hospital on January 11.

The child’s lawyer, Charrandas Persaud had told Stabroek News (SN) that a medical report found that the “legs and tights bore marks consistent to those inflicted with a fine object [whip].”

The report also stated that there was erythema (redness of the skin) to the thorax and that the posterior showed signs of marks inflicted with a baton.
The lawyer told this newspaper that he has “proceeded to court to seek justice because of their [the cops’] reluctance to settle.” He said too that he was still waiting to hear from the police investigating team with regards to the incident.

Persaud complimented Minister of Human Services & Social Security, Priya Manickchand for setting up an account at the Republic Bank for the child and for making arrangements for her ministry to deposit $6,000 monthly.
He also told SN that he met the minister following a letter by him that was published in the newspapers and that he had accompanied her to visit the boy’s family.

Comments

About Comments

We thank all readers who have contributed to this site since its relaunch. This section of the website is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and we hope that readers make full use of it as many have already done.

The comments section is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness.
In recent weeks a large proportion of the comments posted have contained attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity. Comments of these types will be deleted.
Comments which contain gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity will be struck.
We reserve the right to edit/delete comments for length, any libel and taste. We moderate all comments so be patient while your message waits to be approved.
Curious about the little images next to each commenter's name ? Go here and sign up using the same email address you used to register for Stabroeknews.com then upload your image and confirm it.

5 Responses to “Ravanlee Chan case”

ankoko
on July 30th, 2008 8:26 am

Police brutality on a ten year old?? Man this is the lowest!!!
What has the Commissioner and the Minister of Home Affairs said/done on this? Are these ‘policemen’ still on duty?

[Reply to this]
1P1N1D
on July 30th, 2008 4:17 pm

As I am reading this my eyes are swelling up with tears. I am sick and tires of adults mistreating children. When is this mess going to stop and then to find out that the police is the ones doing it? For shame. This is why some police gets no respect…. I hope this young man recover and heal physically and mentally.

[Reply to this]
Debbie
on August 1st, 2008 7:19 pm

The cops let murders and hardned criminals go and this 10 year old child makes a mistake , steals $6,000. and end up in jail for 11 days ? How can this be? Under which laws was he charged, tortured and prosecuted? Let him clean the neighbour’s yard , do chores and repay the amount but not have these rogue cops bash him and detain him in a cell for days on end.

[Reply to this]
Steel
on August 4th, 2008 2:41 pm

It’s got to be that when the police did this to the kid, the situation at the time looks like one that will never be known about. A 10 year old child….!!!!! The good name of the police force are often tarnished by others who wants to be judge and jury all by themselves.

[Reply to this]
warlard 187
on August 6th, 2008 11:43 am

Please mr police man a ten year old? Come on!!!

[Reply to this]