Obama seeks $83.4 billion more in 2009 war funds

The request, to cover the rest of the 2009 fiscal year  which ends on Sept. 30, comes on top of more than $822 billion  that Congress has approved to fund the wars since September  2001, Obama said.

“We face a security situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan  that demands urgent attention,” he said in a letter to Nancy  Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, urging  lawmakers to approve his request swiftly.

“The Taliban is resurgent and al Qaeda threatens America  from its safe haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border.”

Almost 95 percent of the funding would go to support  military efforts to stabilize Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,  Obama said in the letter released by the White House.

The request also includes funding for other national  security priorities of the administration, including assistance  for anti-drug efforts in Mexico, security assistance in Lebanon  and closing down the Guantanamo Bay prison.

Congress has already approved $65.9 billion for the wars in  2009 and some anti-war Democrats expressed reservations about  the new request.

But Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Obama’s policies on  Iraq and Afghanistan enjoyed broad support on Capitol Hill.

“The alternative to the supplemental is a sudden and  precipitous withdrawal … from both places. And I don’t know  anybody who thinks that’s a good idea,” Gates said.

The administration of former President George W. Bush was  widely criticized for using such supplemental requests to fund  the wars. Both Democrats and Republicans said such urgent  requests faced less scrutiny than the regular budget.

Obama has pledged to put an end to the practice and he said  yesterday’s request was “the last planned supplemental”.

The White House said it had to submit another large  supplemental request this time because the wars were only  half-funded for the rest of the 2009 fiscal year.

“The honest budget and appropriations process that the  president has talked about falls somewhat victim to the fact  that this is the way that wars have been funded previously,”  White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told a news briefing.

Representative Jim McGovern, a Democrat, said he was very  worried about by Obama’s plan to send tens of thousands more  troops to Afghanistan, and was not a guaranteed “yes” vote for  the supplemental.

“I was against the war in Iraq from the very beginning, and  I don’t want us to make the same mistake the second time,”  McGovern told Reuters.

Steny Hoyer, the leader of the Democratic majority in the  House of Representatives, indicated the request would be dealt  with swiftly.

“Timely consideration of the supplemental is especially  important to our men and women in uniform, who depend on it for  the resources they need to do their jobs,” he said.

“Congress looks forward to giving it that consideration in  the weeks to come,” Hoyer said in a statement.