Plea deal signals more charges in Stanford case-lawyer

HOUSTON, (Reuters) – A plea agreement signed by  Allen Stanford’s former top aide signals that more people in  the wide-ranging $7 billion fraud case may face charges, a  lawyer involved in the case said yesterday.

“Read the plea agreement language very, very carefully,”  David Finn, a lawyer representing Stanford’s former chief  financial officer said after a hearing in which his client  pleaded guilty to three felony counts.

“I think you will be able to determine that the government  is not finished with their indictments,” said Finn, who  previously worked as a federal prosecutor in Texas.

James Davis, 60, admitted in court to helping carry out a  Ponzi scheme centered around certificates of deposit issued by  Stanford International Bank in Antigua.

He faces a maximum 30 years in prison, but his full  cooperation with prosecutors is likely to reduce the sentence.
Stanford, 59, faces 21 criminal counts related to the  alleged fraud. He is in jail awaiting trial and has denied any  wrongdoing.
Laura Pendergest-Holt, Stanford Financial Group’s chief  investment officer, accounting executives Gilberto Lopez and  Mark Khurt and Antiguan regulator Leroy King are also charged  in the scheme. All except King have pleaded not guilty. King is  awaiting extradition to the United States from Antigua.

The plea document, signed by Davis who is the former chief  financial officer of Stanford Financial Group and the firm’s  offshore bank in Antigua, alleges wrongdoing as early as 1988  when Stanford had an offshore bank on Montserrat.

The document also mentions the roles of individuals  identified only as Outside Attorney A, Stanford International  Bank
Executive A and Stanford Financial Group Attorney A, who  allegedly played in the fraud or in attempted cover-ups.
A representative from the U.S. Department of Justice was  not immediately available to comment if more people will be  charged in the fraud.

Over a period of 10 years, Davis and others created phony  documents that inflated revenue and assets that were meant to  reassure the firm’s CD investors and disguise $2 billion in  loans to Allen Stanford, according to prosecutors.
For example in mid-2008, using a series of flips through  businesses controlled by Stanford, Davis and others turned a  $65 million real estate deal into one that was valued at $3.2  billion on the offshore bank’s books, according to the plea  agreement.
Davis, with the help of Lopez and Khurt would also prepare  fictitious investment reports to give to Antiguan regulators  each quarter. To create falsely inflated values for the  offshore bank’s assets, Davis would extrapolate values and do  the calculations manually, the plea deal said.

They later created a spreadsheet to generate the bogus  revenue numbers, the plea agreement said.
To throw regulators off the trail of the alleged fraud,  Davis and his co-conspirators bribed officials in Antigua.  King, who was head of Antigua’s Financial Services Regulatory  Commission (FSRC) received more than $200,000 in bribes,  according to court documents.

In 2003, Stanford performed a “blood oath” brotherhood  ceremony with King and other FSRC employees in a bid to ensure  they would continue to look the other way when reviewing the  offshore bank’s books, according to the plea agreement.
“During the course of the fraud scheme King routinely  referred to Stanford as ‘Brother’ or ‘Big Brother,’“ the  agreement read.
King also forwarded a confidential correspondence he  received from the Securities and Exchange Commission to  Stanford and another bank executive. Stanford would then help  King draft misleading responses from his regulatory agency, the  plea said.
And sometime in 2003, two FSRC examiners who worked for  King “were becoming aggressive and suspicious in their  examination” of Stanford International Bank’s financial  statements, according to a bank employee.
Stanford sought to reassure the bank employee, saying he  trusted King would take care of the nosy regulators because of  the bribes and the brotherhood oath, prosectors said in the  plea deal.

Both employees “soon thereafter were reassigned or  replaced,” according to the plea deal.