Iran tells UN it wants nuclear fuel first – envoys

UNITED NATIONS, (Reuters) – Iran has told the U.N.  nuclear watchdog it wants fresh fuel for a reactor in Tehran  before it will agree to ship most of its enriched uranium  stocks to Russia and France, diplomats said yesterday.

In what the International Atomic Energy Agency has  described as an initial response to an IAEA-drafted nuclear  fuel proposal, Western diplomats said on condition of anonymity  that major Western powers found the Iranian demand for  immediate access to fresh atomic fuel unacceptable.

Tehran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and has  refused to halt it, while Western powers fear Iran is covertly  developing atomic weapons.

“The Iranians want to get enriched uranium fuel for their  reactor first before they send it abroad, which simply isn’t  acceptable,” one diplomat told Reuters.

Another diplomat confirmed the remarks as accurate.
The diplomats said it was unclear whether the proposal was  a serious one or if the Iranians were trying to drag out the  negotiating process.

“There is some impatience. How many days we have here is  not clear but Iran must soon show it will work with the  proposal that is on the table,” a Western official in  Washington told Reuters.

“We will know probably by early next week — are they  serious, are they coming back with things that are within  bounds or are they sticking to a position that is  unacceptable?”

The press office of Iran’s U.N. mission was not immediately  available for comment. Nor was Iran’s IAEA envoy in Vienna.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, who is in New York for a  series of meetings at U.N. headquarters, also declined to  comment when asked by Reuters about Tehran’s response.

The IAEA proposal calls for Iran to transfer about 75  percent of its known 1.5 metric tons of low-enriched uranium to  Russia for further enrichment by the end of this year, then to  France for conversion into fuel plates for a reactor in Tehran  that produces radio isotopes for cancer treatment.

“Any proposal that moves away from this is unacceptable,”  the Western official in Washington told Reuters.
“We are prepared to allow ElBaradei to work to try to get  this proposal that was agreed upon in Vienna 
 to be pushed  forward in terms of implementation. However, this is not an  endless process.”

The Obama administration has said it favors talks with Iran  rather than the more unpalatable alternatives of sanctions or  military action, but White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said yesterday that President Barack Obama’s “time is not unlimited.”
“This was not about talking for the sake of talking. This  was about reaching an agreement that just a few weeks ago  seemed to be something that the Iranians wanted,” Gibbs said.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Tehran earlier  this week to accept the IAEA proposal, saying it would  “constitute  proposal after signaling it would  do so this week but has leaked other demands for major
changes  that could unravel the tentative pact.

Western diplomats complained Iran had shown scant interest  in following through on a plan they saw as crucial to  demonstrating Tehran’s nuclear ambitions are peaceful.

Iran’s official IRNA news agency said yesterday that Tehran  had not yet given its final response and was ready for more  talks. The report suggested Iran would remain evasive.

“Even if a next round of talks was held, Iran would  announce its opinion and not an answer,” IRNA quoted one source  as saying.

French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero said Iran  appeared to have given only a verbal indication of its position  and proposed changes, which he did not specify.

In addition to the demand for fresh nuclear fuel up front,  Iranian media reported that Tehran wants the low-enriched  uranium to be shipped out in small, staggered portions — not  all in one go as the draft text stipulates.