Dear Editor,
I refer to David Hinds’ letter in SN, June 5, captioned ‘For the PPP its all about a god-given right to govern,’ which may not be appropriate to the main contents of his letter. It talks about Ralph Ramkarran’s latest article (GC June 2) in which he opines that while there are widespread calls for the PNC to apologise there have not been similar calls on the PPP. David Hinds feels there are reasons why the PPP also should apologise, although he admits, that in regard to what Ramkarran said, “he is right.”
Over the decades, I recollect that there have been calls for the PNC to apologise. We had Raphael Trotman, saying while still a member of the PNC that maybe the PNC should offer some form of apology. Also now Dr Van West Charles is indicating that an apology should be made, but Alexander says that all should atone.
At this point in time, I wonder what use an apology from the PNC would be, and how sincere it would be. The best form of apology that the PNC could offer the nation maybe is to unequivocally and unambiguously pledge not to resort to violent tactics or actions that could lead to violence. Any apology may only have value as a catharsis, self-satisfaction or political strategy.
I am not persuaded that there is any need for the PPP to apologise.
Mr Hinds also makes reference to Freddie Kissoon and his “constant subjection of Dr Jagan’s politics to scrutiny” and also “is constantly asking questions of power – an important aspect of democracy,” and it is important to remember the freedom that we are enjoying today, despite the many criticisms that the PPP/C government receives today.
David Hinds then goes on in his letter to give his well known biased account of PPP history. Any disagreement the PPP had with former members was based on ideologies and polices, and not on race. However, let me state in conclusion, that it is the height of absurdity and ridiculousness to state or insinuate that, “the PPP has proved to be the ultimate barrier to ethnic unity and nationhood in Guyana.”
Mr Hinds goes on, at the end of his letter, “I may be wrong, but to paraphrase the calypsonian David Rudder, please make a liar of me.” We do so with alacrity and enthusiasm, as the cap fits him, so draw the string.
Yours faithfully,
John Da Silva
