New Iran sanctions: A question of when, not if

UNITED NATIONS, (Reuters) – China is slowly and  reluctantly falling in line with Russia and four Western powers  by backing the idea of new U.N. sanctions against Iran over its  nuclear program, but Beijing wants any new steps to be weak.

The breakthrough, Western diplomats and analysts say, came  this week after China ended months of delays by agreeing to  enter into serious discussions with five other world powers on  how to draft a new Iran sanctions resolution to be presented to  the 15-nation U.N. Security Council.

But the battle for the full support of China and Russia,  which have close business ties with Iran, has only begun.

“The fact that China agreed to engage is a success,” said  Mark Fitzpatrick of the International Institute for Strategic  Studies. “I don’t think anyone’s making any bets on how long  this process will take. But it looks like it’s no longer a  question of whether but when.”

Fitzpatrick said U.S. President Barack Obama’s success in  ending months of deadlock to get a breakthrough deal with  Russia on a replacement for the Cold War-era START nuclear arms  reduction treaty would give Russian-U.S. ties a boost and help  keep Moscow on board for new Iran sanctions.

Diplomats from the six countries involved in the sanctions  negotiations — the United States, Britain, France, Germany,  China and Russia — say the four Western powers would like a  resolution adopted next month, ahead of a month-long U.N.  conference on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in May.

But they acknowledge that negotiations will probably drag  on until at least June, mostly due to a Chinese and Russian  desire to dilute any proposed punitive measures. Although  Moscow supports the idea of sanctions, it wants them to be  targeted measures focusing on Iran’s nuclear program.

“China may accept a U.N. resolution with sanctions in the  end, but with great reluctance, as it has before,” said Shi  Yinhong, a professor at Renmin University in Beijing.

“China faces growing pressure to act,” Shi said. “(But) it  knows that the United States and other powers are desperate to  have China included as part of a unified stance. That still  gives China room to maneuver, and it will fully use it.”

China and Russia, like the United States, Britain and  France, have veto power on the Security Council.

China values US ties

The Brussels-based International Crisis Group (ICG) said in  a recent report that China’s delay tactics bring certain  benefits for Beijing, which analysts and diplomats say has  become increasingly assertive on the Security Council, a body  where it once preferred to remain invisible.

“Pursuit of the diplomatic track delays punitive action and  maximizes Beijing’s bargaining power with regard to both Iran  and the West,” the ICG report said. “Nevertheless, if Russia  finally supports sanctions, China will likely come on board to  avoid diplomatic isolation.” The report added: “Beijing will not side with Iran at the  expense of its relations with the U.S. Despite recent troubles  in the Sino-U.S. relationship, China still values those ties  more than its ties to Iran.”

Iran rejects Western allegations that the goal of its  nuclear program is to develop the capability to produce atomic  weapons. It insists its ambitions are limited to the generation  of electricity and has ignored five Security Council  resolutions demanding that it cease enriching uranium.

Russia and China have been putting pressure on Iran behind  the scenes. Western diplomats told Reuters that the two powers  quietly admonished Iran’s government in Tehran earlier this  month, saying they wanted it to accept a U.N.-backed nuclear  fuel offer and to change its nuclear policy.

They added that neither received a satisfactory reply so  far, which might help explain China’s decision to join this  week’s six-power conference call on Iran.

Russia and China backed three previous resolutions in 2006,  2007 and 2008 imposing limited sanctions against Iran — travel  bans and asset freezes targeting some Iranian individuals and  firms linked to Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs.

But they did so after working hard to water down the  proposed measures to the point where some analysts and  diplomats said the U.N. sanctions were largely symbolic. Although the measures appeared mild on paper, the United  States, European Union and their allies have implemented many  of the measures aggressively, effectively blacklisting several  major Iranian banks and pressuring major Western firms to pull  out of the Islamic Republic.

This, Western diplomats say, has hurt Iran more than  expected. And if the council imposes further sanctions on Iran,  the EU would most likely pass its own implementing measures  that go beyond any U.N. sanctions, European diplomats say.

The latest U.S.-drafted sanctions proposal, which the  United States circulated to Russia and China nearly a month ago  after agreeing on it with Germany, France and Britain, would  expand the U.N. blacklist to include some Islamic Revolutionary  Guard Corps members and firms its controls.

A French call for energy sector sanctions was left out of  the U.S. draft, as was a proposed ban on transactions linked to  Iran’s central bank, which Germany opposed, envoys said.

But it does call for expanding existing limits on arms  trade with Iran into a full weapons embargo, with an inspection  regime similar to one in place for North Korea, and would  blacklist several Iranian shipping firms.

Russia has said it dislikes the idea of an arms embargo and  other measures in the U.S. draft. China has not reacted yet.