US military study gives green light to end gay ban

WASHINGTON, (Reuters) – The Pentagon unveiled a study  yesterday that predicted little impact if the U.S. military  ended its ban on gays, bolstering President Barack Obama’s push  to get Congress to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” by year-end.

Gay rights activists swiftly applauded the study, which  dismissed or minimized concerns among some U.S. lawmakers and up  to a third of the military about ending the policy.

Obama called for swift action by Congress, where he faces  stiff opposition from Senate Republicans who are threatening to  block him.

“I call on the Senate to act as soon as possible so I can  sign this repeal into law this year and ensure that Americans who  are willing to risk their lives for their country are treated  fairly and equally,” Obama said in a statement.

Still, top U.S. generals voiced concern about the fallout on  U.S. forces fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Defense  Secretary Robert Gates warned they would need plenty of time to  prepare for integration of openly serving gays and lesbians.
“An abundance of care and preparation is required if we are  to avoid a disruptive — and potentially dangerous — impact on  the performance of those serving at the ‘tip of the spear’ in  America’s wars,” Gates told reporters.

At least 13,000 men and women have been expelled from the  military since “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” which allows gays to  serve in the armed forces as long as they keep their sexual  orientation private, came into force in 1993.

The study dismissed as exaggerated notions that ending the  ban would lead to overt promiscuity, widespread “effeminacy”  among men and “unwelcome advances.” It also opposed separate  living quarters or bathrooms for gay or lesbian troops, a  possibility raised in the past by some in the U.S. military.

It recommended a training program to educate soldiers on the  implications of lifting the ban. Gates refused to say how long  such training might take but warned that an immediate end to the  ban through court action would be “dangerous.”
“If a court ordered us to do this tomorrow, I believe the  risk to the force would be high — if we had no time to prepare,”  Gates said.