U.S. vote dims hopes for stronger world climate pact

SINGAPORE/OSLO, (Reuters) – Hopes for stronger world  action in 2010 to curb climate change have dimmed after the  U.S. Democrats lost a key Senate seat to a Republican opposed  to capping emissions, experts said  yesterday.

The election of Republican Scott Brown, an opponent of cap  and trade, to the Senate after the death of Democrat Edward  Kennedy dims prospects for U.S. action. Once Brown takes  office, Democrats will have 59 seats in the Senate and the  Republicans 41. The bill needs 60 votes to overcome procedural  hurdles.

Backers of the existing international Kyoto Protocol, which  obliges all industrialized nations except the United States to  cut emissions until 2012, will be more reluctant to take on  tougher new goals for 2020 unless Washington also joins in.

U.N. climate talks in Mexico in November are meant to build  on a weak “Copenhagen Accord” worked out last month by nations  including the United States that sets a goal of limiting  warming to no more than 2 Celsius (3.6 F) above pre-industrial  times.

But the Mexico meeting will be undermined if the United  States, the top emitter behind China, has not set caps on  carbon emissions. That might dash hopes for a Kyoto successor  from 2013 and mean a system of domestic pledges instead.

“We can’t afford climate to be a dysfunctional regime like  trade,” said Nick Mabey, head of the E3G climate think-tank in  London. He said there were risks talks would stall, like the  inconclusive Doha round on freer world trade launched in 2001.

Mary Nichols, the top official implementing California’s  state climate change law, told Reuters that state and regional  climate change efforts could now take center stage in the  United States.

“We’ve been feeling ever since Copenhagen that the focus  was going to be on regional efforts for the coming year,  regardless of what happened in the Massachusetts  election,” she said in a telephone interview.

Many nations have been sitting on the fence before deciding  firm carbon policies, waiting for U.S. legislation. President  Barack Obama wants to cut emissions by 4 percent below 1990  levels by 2020, or a 17 percent cut from 2005 levels.

Countries are supposed to propose carbon-cutting policies  under the Copenhagen Accord by Jan. 31.

U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said the legislation  might have to be split in two to ensure that less controversial  parts encouraging use of alternative energies can pass. Tougher  elements limiting emissions could then be handled separately.

“I don’t believe that cap and trade is dead,” he said.

MOMENTUM

Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat,  said U.S. willingness to act had built since ex-President  George W. Bush took office in 2001 and said Kyoto would cost  jobs and wrongly omitted carbon curbs by poor nations.

“I don’t think that any political development in the United  States means turning back nine years on the climate change  agenda,” he said. Many Americans were concerned, for instance,  with energy security and hoped for jobs in a greener economy.

But some experts said failure to pass U.S. legislation  could have a knock-on in countries such as Australia, Japan or  Canada which are considering stronger action beyond 2012 that  aims to avert ever more heatwaves, droughts, floods and rising  sea levels.

“2009 was fairly disappointing and 2010 could be another  year of slow policy development to those trying to launch their  own cap and trade schemes,” said Trevor Sikorski, director of  carbon markets research at Barclays Capital.

Still, he predicted the value of global carbon markets  would grow in 2010 — boosted by an increase in prices even  though the growth of trading volume would slow.

“The issue of cap and trade does not necessarily go away. I  expect banks will continue low-key capacity building as there  is no downside if a market doesn’t develop by 2011 or later,”  said Garth Edward, head of environmental products at Citi.

“They’ll keep building the franchise,” he said.

The European Union sees itself as a leader in combating  climate change, and has set a goal of cutting emissions by 20  percent below 1990 levels by 2020, or 30 percent if others  join.