The Singapore Statement provides a guide for the responsible conduct of research

Dear Editor,
In July 2010, the Second World Conference on Research Integrity took place in Singapore. On September 22, 2010, the conference released the Singapore Statement, a product of 350 delegates from 50 countries. The conference addressed research misconduct, poor research practices, and the need to advance research integrity collaboratively and internationally.

The Preamble to the Singapore Statement takes the view that the values and benefits of research rely on research integrity. The statement’s principles are honesty, accountability, professional courtesy and fairness, and good stewardship.

The Singapore Statement presents 14 responsibilities with which researchers need to comply. These are integrity; adherence to regulations; research methods; research records; research findings; authorship; publication acknowledgment; peer review; conflict of interest; public communication; reporting irresponsible research practices; responding to irresponsible research practices; research environments; and societal considerations.

Among the 14 responsibilities is that researchers must differentiate professional comments from opinions arising from personal views during public discussions. Director of the Research Ethics and Integrity Program at the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research Professor Nick Steneck noted that there are some scientists who confuse the line between their scientific findings and their opinions (THES, 2010).

He believes that while researchers do have a right to hold and disseminate their opinions, at the same time, they need to evaluate their opinions against societal benefits and risks. Professor Steneck would like to think that the Singapore Statement would help governments, organizations and researchers to be constructive.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) was co-sponsor of the conference. Its intent is to harmonize standards, and a good way to begin such an exercise is to secure an international agreement on research integrity.

The Singapore statement really is a global guide for the responsible conduct of research, and should not be classified as a regulatory document. This document would have strong utility value wherever there is responsible conduct of research, but particularly so in societies where there is a paucity of research. Universities and governments now have the responsibility to establish institutional mechanisms to ensure that there is responsible conduct of research.

Yours faithfully,
Prem Misir


The government will be supplying potential sugar estate owners with billions in subsidies

Dear Editor, The GAWU, through reports that appeared in several sections of the press, was, to say the least, surprised to learn that the state-owned NICIL Special Purpose Unit (SPU), according to Finance Minister Winston Jordan, was seeking financing in the region of $10billion to $15billion in order to resume operations at East Demerara and Skeldon Estates.

Consumers have a part to play in safeguarding themselves from being attacked after visiting banks

Dear Editor, Like many Guyanese, I have been following the increasing number of reports regarding persons being attacked/robbed after conducting financial transactions at various places, including banks.

Judging rules were not observed in Senior Panorama Competition

Dear Editor,  What were the judges looking for when deciding the winner for the Senior Panorama Competition 2018?

GPOC needs to address the weaknesses in the pension payment system

Dear Editor, During last week, the Stabroek News reported that the Guyana Post Office Corporation (GPOC) and the Ministry of Public Telecommunica-tions are currently researching the introduction of a “debit card-like system” for pensioners to receive their monthly payments.

Burke’s statements included falsehoods

Dear Editor, As a proud member of the Guyana Bar Association, I took grave offence when I read a letter written to the editor by Rickford Burke and published in the press on the 21st Feb, 2018, seeking to denigrate an association of some of the most distinguished professionals in Guyana.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now