Bin Hammam loses appeal against life ban

BERNE, (Reuters) – Former FIFA presidential  candidate Mohamed Bin Hammam has lost his appeal against a life  ban for his part in a cash-for-votes scandal, one of several  recent controversies to hit world soccer.   

“The appeal made by Mohamed Bin Hammam has been rejected and  the decision of the FIFA ethics committee confirmed,” FIFA said  in a statement yesterday.   “The sanction of being banned from taking part in any kind  of football-related activity (administrative, sports or any  other) at national and international level for life has  therefore been maintained.”     

Former Asian Football Confederation (AFC) and FIFA executive  committee member Bin Hammam confirmed through his lawyer Eugene  Gulland that he would appeal to the Court of Arbitration for  Sport (CAS).    Gulland said the Qatari would also challenge the decision to  designate Zhang Jilong as acting AFC president and appoint him  to the FIFA executive committee.  Bin Hammam challenged Sepp Blatter for the FIFA presidency  earlier this year.        

He withdrew his candidacy, and was then provisionally  suspended, days before the June election over allegations that  he had tried to buy the votes of Caribbean officials by handing  them $40,000 each in brown envelopes.   Blatter was subsequently re-elected unopposed for a fourth  term as FIFA president.         

Qatari Bin Hammam was then banned for life by FIFA’s ethics  committee in July after being found to have broken seven  articles of the ethics code, including one on bribery.  Former CONCACAF president Jack Warner, considered a major  FIFA powerbroker, resigned in June after he was also accused of  wrongdoing at the same meeting as Bin Hammam in Trinidad on May  10-11.     The investigation against Warner was dropped as a result of  his resignation.         

A further 16 Caribbean officials, eight of them heads of  their national federations, were placed under investigation by  FIFA’s ethics committee last month. Bin Hammam has denied the allegations against him.      

“Bin Hammam has already gone on record stating that he was  not optimistic of justice prevailing from the FIFA appeals  process but this was a protocol to enable him to obtain access  to CAS,” said his lawyer’s statement.     

“We also continue to champion the need for transparency and  call on FIFA to publish the transcripts of the appeals panel as  well as that of the Ethics Committee proceedings in July.” FIFA said the three-man appeal committee consisted of  Francisco Acosta (Ecuador), Fernando Mitjans (Argentina) and  Augustin Senghor (Senegal).