Sino-Forest is no ‘Ponzi’ scheme — panel report

HONG KONG, (Reuters) – Canada-listed  Sino-Forest Corp said an independent committee found no  evidence of fraud at the Chinese timber firm following  allegations from short-seller Muddy Waters it had exaggerated  its assets, although the committee also said it had been unable  to verify the company owned all of its forests.

“We can categorically say Sino-Forest is not the ‘near total  fraud’ and ‘Ponzi scheme’ as alleged by Muddy Waters,” CEO  Judson Martin said in a statement on the interim report.

Accounting scandals swirling around several China-focused  companies listed in North America have prompted trade halts,  delistings, lawsuits and regulatory probes. Sino-Forest faces  several class-action lawsuits from investors who lost money.

Sino-Forest was the largest forestry company listed on the  Toronto Stock Exchange until its shares collapsed in June after  the fraud allegations surfaced. The stock is down 80 percent and  was suspended in August pending investigations by regulators  and, last week, Canadian police.

In the latest twist to the months-long saga, research firm  Muddy Waters, founded by Carson Block, said the timing of  Sino-Forest’s announcement “makes clear that the directors and  officers are responding to the criminal investigation announced  last week”.

“It should be noted that all three directors who oversaw the  investigation are defendants in shareholder lawsuits, and one  resigned just prior to this release,” Muddy Waters said.

“We believe this release has no credibility.”

In addition, the report said the committee had been unable  to verify that Sino-Forest owned all its forests.

 “BRUISED, BUT NOT BROKEN”       

The scandal has forced staunch allies, including hedge fund  manager John Paulson, to abandon Sino-Forest. Paulson alone took  a $500 million loss.

In his statement, Martin, a Canadian, said the committee  verified the company’s cash balances, timber assets, book values  and revenues. A final report by the committee should be  completed by the end of the year.

He later told reporters in Hong Kong that Sino-Forest had  been “bruised, but not broken” by claims that were “either  malicious or uninformed”, although he acknowledged the process  had highlighted shortcomings in the business.

“I do see the PRC (China) business flourishing in the  future,” he said, adding the accusations showed a fundamental  misunderstanding of how business works in China.

A senior Shanghai Stock Exchange official on Tuesday urged  companies listed in the United States to return home, saying U.S. institutions had politicised accounting issues involving  Chinese firms.

 LIMITED ACCESS       

Sino-Forest said the committee was “verifying information  regarding certain of the company’s relationships with its  suppliers and authorized intermediaries, and addressing other  issues”. Muddy Waters had accused the owner of tree plantations  in China of fraudulently exaggerating its assets.

Deep in the 43-page report — which cost the company $35  million — the committee noted it couldn’t verify that  Sino-Forest actually owned all its forests, and was barred from  seeing databases and discouraged from visiting some of the  forestry bureaus that hold registration documents.

John Hempton, whose Sydney-based Bronte Capital is a  prominent short-seller of Sino-Forest stock, said he “blanched”  at initial coverage of the report, but felt vindicated after  reading the committee’s disclosure on those limitations.

“Every single meeting with forestry officials to confirm  documents purporting to prove ownership of forests was set up by  management,” he told Reuters. “One person who management  represented as a senior forestry official was found to be an  employee of Sino-Forest — but that didn’t ring alarm bells.”  Short sellers borrow stocks and then sell them in the hope  they will decline so they can buy them back later at a lower  price, pocketing the difference.

 CAVEATS   

Zhi Wei Feng, a Singapore-based credit analyst with Standard  Chartered, said: “The worst may be over, but … it  (Sino-Forest) has to win back market confidence and improve  investor perception. Also, there are still caveats in the actual  report.”

“This is the beginning of some very good news for us — long  overdue,” Simon Murray, chairman of commodities trader Glencore  International Plc and an independent Sino-Forest  director, told Reuters from Switzerland.

“I never doubted it, but it has been very hard work to prove  it given the sort of work involved in the forestry commission,  the farmers, the land owners, and everybody else,” he said.