PPP/C views with concern the joint opposition’s attack on the integrity and independence of the judiciary

Dear Editor,
The PPP/Civic administration views with deep concern the recent proclivity of the joint opposition, both in and out of Parliament, to make statements that, expressly and by implication, constitute an attack on the integrity and independence of the judiciary.   Further, it is the view of the administration, that these statements by their express language and tenor are designed to pit the executive against the judiciary. Frequent references are made to the government’s resort to the judiciary for redress against flagrant violations of the constitution by the joint opposition in the National Assembly. The government’s exercise of this democratic right and constitutional freedom is, irrationally, viewed by the opposition as an attempt by the administration to wage “war” against the legislature.

The latest statement issued by the Alliance For Change published on December 18, 2012, must be viewed against this politically inspired backdrop.  This statement, in effect, blames the administration for the non-appointment of office holders to the positions of Chancellor and Chief Justice, respectively. The statement further insinuates that the government is deliberately perpetuating such state of affairs in order to derive, presumably, favourable rulings from these office holders.  Its falsity apart, this insipid insinuation constitutes a most callous assault on the integrity and reputation of two distinguished jurists of this land who have served their country with distinction.

Additionally, the AFC, whose leadership consists of several lawyers, fully well knows that the persons who are acting in those two offices are, substantively, the Chief Justice of the country and a Justice of Appeal and therefore they currently enjoy the most impregnable security of tenure that the constitution offers by virtue of those substantive appointments.

Significantly, the makers of this statement, either by design or because of unfamiliarity with the issue, omit to acknowledge the documented efforts of both former President Bharrat Jagdeo and President Donald Ramotar to secure the agreement of the Leader of the Opposition, as is constitutionally required, to fill these vacancies.  Unfortunately, these efforts were futile. The administration remains hopeful that an agreement can be realized earliest.   In fact, the administration urges the AFC to focus their attention on encouraging the Leader of the Opposition to respond to the President‘s overtures to fill these vacancies.

The AFC’s contentions are, therefore, characteristically devoid of any merit.
The administration further regards as an outrage, the bizarre allegation of the AFC that it has declared “war” against the legislature.  Ours is a position which is founded in principle. The administration will challenge all or any violations of the constitution or onslaught on the rule of law whenever it occurs and whoever is the perpetrator.  It is our democratic right to do so and indeed, a devolved constitutional duty, which we will not shirk.  In this regard, the National Assembly enjoys no exemption either in logic or law.

Finally, the administration does not discount the possibility that this statement is a veiled attempt by the AFC to intimidate the Honourable Chief Justice, who currently, has conduct of a matter filed by the Attorney-General challenging the opposition’s actions in the National Assembly which resulted in the Speaker prohibiting the Minister of Home Affairs and an elected member of the National Assembly, Mr Clement Rohee, from discharging his duties in the House.
The administration intends to vigilantly monitor and expose this new AFC political strategy of judicial intimidation.
Yours faithfully,
Mohabir Anil Nandlall MP
Attorney General and Minister of
Legal Affairs


Rasul’s vote for parking meter contract a betrayal of Team Benschop

Dear Editor, In response to a few queries concerning the questionable voting by Sunil Rasul, who has cast his personal vote in support of the parking meter contract, I wish to make it pellucidly clear that Rasul has been occupying the council seat illegally since November of 2017, and without the support of Team Benschop.

The CJIA should not be profiling Rastafari and those with locks

  Dear Editor, On the last four occasions and as recently as January 18th, 2018, whilst an outgoing passenger at Cheddi Jagan International Airport (CJIA), Timehri, I was asked to open my locks so that someone could run their hands through my hair.

Police charged wrong suspects and say the file on real suspects is lost

Dear Editor, I was the victim of a shooting incident that occurred in front of my Zorg business premises in Region 2 some time ago.

The lethargy of the police is getting worse now that there is Wifi at police stations

Dear Editor, I was elated that our Commissioner of Police (ag), Mr David Ramnarine announced that his detectives had solved 77% of the murders or 88 cases out of 116.

Eight not nine

Dear Editor, Our union was bemused after it read that Agriculture Minister Noel Holder is being quoted in the January 16, 2018 Kaieteur News as saying that “in 1992, GuySuCo had nine estates and 38,000 workers”.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now