There is a difference in the approaches of the present and past administration to state land for officials

Dear Editor,

I wish to share my thoughts a topic that was stimulated by bloggers‘ comments on the findings of Carl Greenidge’s request to have research done on past and present senior government officials getting state land.

In the case of Mr Greenidge’s request, the findings indicate that Viola Burnham and Ptolemy Reid were granted limited land leases for free, based on their personal positions and service to the nation. The emphasis in on ‘limited.’ Both leases had expiration dates attached and came to an end just before and after the present administration assumed office in 1992.

This indicates a marked difference between the modus operandi of the two administrations. Beliefs are perpetuated and manifested in the way people do things.

The findings of Mr Greenidge’s request indicate that there was no intention to usurp and own government lands forever.

The ability to sell and gain a profit was never intended. The land could not be transferred to offspring and such like. It was a privilege extended to someone in high office for a reasonable duration of time.

On the other hand a lot of previously state-owned lands were allocated and ‘bought’ by this new breed of government officials and associates of these officials. ‘Bought‘ means they were supposedly paid for. What the findings did not address were, in these present cases, how much was really paid, was there a track record to indicate where the money went and if the payment was on par with market values.

One thing about Linden. In a recent letter I asked to halt the destruction of the draglines in Kwakwani. I have seen no response in relation to this matter, which is sad. Are the atrocities still taking place? Mr Lincoln Lewis, Mr Sam Hinds, SN or anyone who knows – what happened to the massive dragline that was christened Sir Walker in the seventies?

Yours faithfully,
F Skinner

Comments  

Official government communications on sugar plans have been less than clear

Dear Editor, We regret that our statement on sugar, published in the Stabroek News Diaspora Column on Monday January 8, communicated the idea that the government was closing the sugar industry.

National tender administration does not have forms which it has advertised

Dear Editor, The National Procurement and Tender Administration (NPTA) placed advertisements spanning 9 pages on their new Supplier Registration Form, which advised that the forms could be obtained from the NPTA page of the Ministry of Finance website, at the NPTA or by email request to SPO_Compliance@Finance.gov.

GMWO needs to hold an AGM

Dear Editor, It has been three years since the Guyana Women Miners Organisation has held their Annual General Meeting in contravention of their charter and constitution.

‘Racists have needed Haiti to be poor since it was founded’

Dear Editor, President Trump’s latest derogatory outburst with which he tends to litter his rants and twitter drive-bys managed to provoke condemnation around the world as usual.

A new political party? To what avail?

Dear Editor, I refer to the call embedded in the article titled, ‘Guyana needs a new political party –Ramkarran’ (SN, Jan 15). 

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×