A lawyer can be elevated to senior counsel even if there is no substantive appointment to the office of chancellor

Dear Editor,

 

E B John’s letter entitled ‘Instructive profiles should be published on respective selectees for silk’ (SN, May 24) refers.

The cumulative effect of the writer’s analysis is that the office of chancellor is vacant and that any elevation of legal practitioners to senior counsel by the acting Chancellor will be void ab initio. Further, Mr John advanced that the President of the CCJ is effectively the head of Guyana’s judiciary.

It is an ineluctable truth that the continuous executive and opposition lawlessness in this country is reflected in the stubbornness of current and past presidents of the Republic to abide by the constitution. For instance, the non-appointment of a chancellor and chief justice are evidence of such recalcitrance. These appointments are necessary for a properly constituted Court of Appeal (article 124) and High Court (article 125) according to the Guyana Constitution. This is not a difficult task. Both the Chancellor (ag) and Chief Justice (ag) have demonstrated their ability to head our judiciary effectively. This has been confirmed time and again by rulings of the CCJ which lauded their sound judgements.

However, their non-appointment in no way affects the powers vested in the office they hold as the writer posited. Article 127 (2) of the constitution makes provision for the appointment of a judge to the office of chancellor or chief justice in the absence of a substantive holder. This is after meaningful consultations with the opposition leader. The appointee (ag) is then equipped with such powers and rights necessary for the performance of the duties of that office until a substantive appointment is made.

It follows that a temporary holder of the office of chancellor will be responsible for advertising the opportunity for senior counsel and determining the procedures for the elevation of legal practitioners to such standing. Mr John, therefore, was wrong in his interpretation of the competence of the Chancellor (ag) in the performance of such function. Thus, it is submitted that a practitioner can be elevated to senior counsel in the absence of a substantive holder of the office of chancellor.

Furthermore, it must be declared that the President of the CCJ is not the head of Guyana’s judiciary. Under articles 21 paragraph (1) and 25 paragraph (7) of the CCJ agreement, the role of the President is administrator of the court in its original and appellate jurisdictions respectively.

Further, there is a clear absence in the agreement of an intention by the drafters to confer such function as head of Guyana’s judiciary or the judiciary of any other party to the agreement on the CCJ President. By virtue of article 123 (4) of Guyana’s Constitution and later legislative enactment, the CCJ is recognised as the final court for purposes of appeal and not the administration of the judiciary as the writer posited. Therefore, the observation “that the Chancellor (ag) is not the head of the Guyana judiciary, but the President of the Caribbean Court of Justice…” remains fanciful.

Yours faithfully,
Kevin Morgan

Comments  

Pile-driving by private citizen for first-floor pool threatening nearby homes

Dear Editor, The bombardment of the Triumph front lands community on the East Coast of Demerara, continues.

Lessons

Dear Editor, Your editorial yesterday, on the non-implementation of CoI recommendations among other accepted policies, brings to mind two of my ‘Rules for Living in the Rupununi’: 4.

I am a GNBA board member but I do not back Broadcasting Bill

Dear Editor, I am a member of the Governing Board of the Guyana National Broadcasting Authority, having been nominated by the Leader of the Opposition.

The Public Utilities Commission must act within the parameters of Act 10, 1999

Dear Editor, From the onset, permit us to state that it is not the policy of the Public Utilities Commission to respond to articles or letters published in the media, as some concerns and/or issues are directly within the purview of the utility in question.

Noise levels at night around All Saints Church, NA intolerable

Dear Editor, I am writing to ask for your intervention in a matter of great urgency in the town of New Amsterdam and it concerns the application of laws, rules, and regulations (or lack thereof) in the matter of noise abatement at the comer of Trinity and Main Streets.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×