Letter was not about remarks but about where and when remarks were made

Dear Editor,

It is with great regret that I have to pen this letter in response to a letter in your July 12 edition, captioned ‘Region Eight Chairman was not heckled,’ written by Minister Norman Whittaker.

My letter was not about Minister Manickchand’s remarks as Mr Whittaker is trying to make out, but about where and when she made those remarks. My contention is that remarks on those occasions should be in keeping with the norms of etiquette. Those occasions are not for personal remarks or ‘cuss down.’

Concerning the school dorms the Minister was indeed heckling which is what caused me to give the microphone to her. What Mr Whittaker is claiming concerning the visit to the dorms is totally untrue. I received a call at about 8.30 pm that there was a student at the dorms with a sick foot; I told the caller to call the doctor and then I left home and went to the dorms to see what assistance I could give based on the report I received. When I reached the dorms I decided to take the child on my ATV to the hospital. As I was about to ride off I saw a vehicle coming so I waited on it. It was the doctor, and if the doctor is honest he will tell you that he met the child sitting on my ATV.

My visit was not at 2am but 9pm after receiving a call about a medical emergency. The persons whom I asked to accompany me, however, were two female members of parliament, namely Ms June Marcello and Ms Valerie Garrido-Lowe.

Even if what the Minister was claiming was true, a workshop was not the forum to discuss those issues. Unfortunately these guys don’t seem to get it.

If the Minister had issues with the AFC she should have had an audience with the leadership of the AFC to discuss her concerns. To date for some strange reason she has never raised the issues with our members of parliament, so if what they are claiming is true why wait only now to highlight it. Of course anybody with a modicum of common sense can see what they are up to.

I was not surprised at Minister Whittaker claiming she was not heckling; at the Independence flag-raising ceremony this year he was sitting next to the REO who was continuing to heckle while I was making my remarks and he did not caution him. Apparently the Minister did not see anything wrong with him behaving in such an unethical manner.

The Minister is also asking me apologize to Minister Manickchand. I would like Minister Whittaker to know that I will not apologize to the Minister; as a matter of fact she should apologize to me over her behaviour at the workshop.

In conclusion I would like to advise the Minister that instead of allowing himself to be used to give lame excuses and try to divert from the truth in defence of the Education Minister, he should ask his government to provide funds to the Region Eight RDC to repair the inner Mahdia roads and ensure that a proper ambulance is sent to Mahdia.

 Yours faithfully,

Mark Crawford

Comments  

Without constitutional reform the two big parties will continue to pander to their bases

Dear Editor, Within the past week Messrs Rickford Burke and Vishnu Bisram in separate letters to the press have called for the youth population in Guyana to form a new political party to replace the two major, entrenched political parties in the country.

The regime should reverse its anti-worker stance and create jobs

Dear Editor, Wherever you go in the country and speak to business people, large and small, you will be told the same thing: business has slowed to a stop.

Government did know number of sugar workers to be retrenched

Dear Editor, The GAWU recognized the January 16, 2018 Stabroek News reporting Minister of State Joseph Harmon as saying “…that the government was not sure of exactly how many workers would be sent home and so had made the nominal allocation”.

President should not be referred to as ‘Prezzie’ by radio host

Dear Editor, On Wednesday, January 17, close to 17:00 hours, I was in a hire car on my way home.

Why did production not take place?

Dear Editor, On the one hand a government agency has seized a property over non-payment of rent allegedly for a period that exceeded two years.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×