Why did we install an 80,000 tonne packaging plant in a factory which produces only 19,598 tonnes of sugar a year?

Dear Editor,

Reference an article in the Stabroek News of August 25 captioned ‘Inadequate, pricey and not in demand, low sugar supply slows Enmore packaging plant.’ I had in a previous letter to the editor made the observation that the misguided policy of GuySuCo spending large sums of money on special packaged sugars at Enmore and Blairmont was ill-conceived and probably unworkable. This is being displayed in all of its glory in the report I have referred to, since, as it says, “Low sugar production and the lack of markets for packaged sugar have seen the Guyana Sugar Corporation’s (GuySuCo) Enmore packaging plant functioning at a low level. The US$12.5 million sugar packaging facility’s potential is tied to the sugar production of the Enmore estate but over the years, that has been low and the plant has not reached its full capacity. The plant, which was made possible due to assistance from the European Union, was originally intended to package up to 80,000 tonnes of sugar annually.”

The newspaper is right to question this stupidity; why did we install an 80,000 tonne packaging plant in a factory which produces a total of only 19,598 tonnes of sugar per year? This is a question which only the heads at GuySuCo can answer. My dear departed Mother used to say, “Where ignorance is bliss it’s folly to be wise.”

It is however not why I am writing this letter; in the same Stabroek News article we see that the second crop of GuySuCo has produced just a little over 16,000 tonnes to date!

On a normal week GuySuCo can produce 10,000 tonnes; the second crop started on July 18, 2014 and it’s now August 25, 2014, therefore the estates have been grinding for 4.3 weeks. If the corporation was on its normal 10,000 tonne per week potential production for the second crop the production should have been closer to 43,333 tonnes. So the current production rate is only around 40% of its potential total weekly target.

They are going to say rainfall is causing it, but actually even though in the current poor drainage system of Georgetown the city continues to flood, this has not been a heavy rainfall August for Guyana; it’s been a moderate August rainfall month. In this situation when the corporation is already in such a sad financial position, producing at only 40% of the potential weekly production is not acceptable and must be costing us a lot in cost per tonne.

These are not the kind of facts which would make us comfortable that GuySuCo is turning anything except belly up. It is certainly not turning around.

In a related matter I see that the rice farmers are forming a committee to approach the Venezuelan government for access to the Guyana quota of rice and paddy. Unfortunately the PetroCaribe deal is a government to government deal and this initiative by these enterprising farmers may not go very far, but they are on the right track, they are forming themselves into what can be seen as an independent Rice Producers Association (they clearly don’t have any confidence in the one that is existing now, which is a political creature). I want to tell them that this is a good thing, since in numbers there is strength; the cane farmers should do the same thing.

And if there is any way for me to help them, I will try.

Yours faithfully,
Tony Vieira

 

Comments  

Broadcasting Bill violates constitutional rights

Dear Editor, The Parliamentary Opposition, the Guyana Press Association, the owners of almost every media house in the country, the Private Sector Com-mission, the Georgetown Chamber of Commerce, the largest amalgam of trade unions in the country, FITUG, the Association of Caribbean Media Workers, Reporters without Borders and the International Press Institute, have all expressed their condemnation of the Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill 2017, and the failure of the government to consult prior to its promulgation in the National Assembly.

Which investor will want to come if they are subjected to this level of trauma?

Dear Editor, I read with absolute shock the blazing and bold headlines in the Guyana Chronicle, on Tuesday,  August 15, 2017, ‘Tracking the Money… Sleepin boss, associates snared in money laundering probe… SOCU tells Gaming Authority investigation on since 2016’. 

Government should decriminalise possession of small amounts of marijuana

Dear Editor, We, the members of the Guyana American Patriotic Forum (GAPF), are seeking the immediate intervention of the Government of Guyana to halt the criminalization of Guyanese youths who are routinely incarcerated for smoking small amounts of marijuana.

For how many hours did the Albion bioethanol plant operate in 2016 and 2017?

Dear Editor, I refer to the letter by Ms Audreyanna Thomas in SN, Aug 12, titled ‘Molasses would be the preferred raw material for ethanol production in Guyana’ in response to the ongoing conversation on ethanol here.

Omission

In the letter captioned ‘Government revenues from state forest permissions is 1/95 of what was earned in 1861 per hectare’ by Janette Bulkan, published in our edition yesterday, a paragraph was inadvertently omitted.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×