Scaling down the sugar industry

The pragmatism associated with the decision to significantly scale down the size of a sugar industry which has become a significant financial strain on the rest of the economy and on the country as a whole cannot gainsay the hardships at individual, family and community levels that will accrue from the alarming levels of job losses, some of which have already been announced. What needs to be acknowledged in the instance of the sugar industry is, first, that to persist in the prevarication that has preceded the eventual decision on the future of the industry would have been patently unwise, given what we are aware was the extent of the subsidy that it was taking just to keep the corporation standing on decidedly shaky legs. The second and by no means trivial consideration are the consequences of scaling back the sector, not least the obligation now accruing to those workers whose jobs stand imperiled.  

It makes little sense – given what we know of our political culture – to wish and hope that the travails of the sugar industry will not continue to be a matter of political controversy. That is just the nature of the beast though the loaded suggestions coming from some quarters that the travails of sugar do not reflect the painful reality but are in fact, a spiteful political contrivance, is surely taking it too far. It surely strains credulity to think that sheer political malice could cause the political administration to ‘call time’ on the sugar industry for no good reason in circumstances where it is bound to be faced with a political backlash the scale of which would be difficult to stomach.

 The problem is, of course, that the winding down of the sugar industry is taking place in a particularly contentious political climate and, as well, against the backdrop of a militant trade union that recognizes that the scaling back of sugar could impact negatively on its own influence. The other regrettably unpalatable reality is that the problems in the sugar industry will – whether we like it or not – have a polarizing effect on the society, though the extent of that polarization is unclear at this time.

 In word, at least, the Finance Minister has given some reassuring commitments regarding government’s commitment to sugar and to sugar workers beyond this difficult period. He alludes to what he says is government’s “intensified focus on diversification and value-added production in the non-sugar agriculture sector” a development which he treats with “as the sugar industry continues to undergo restructuring.” There is also a measure of reassurance in the Finance Minister’s statement that “government intends to uphold its duty to the communities and families in the areas affected by divestment as part of GuySuCo’s divestment” which can be taken to mean that it will shoulder some of the responsibility for the well-being of the affected individuals, families and communities through (presumably among other things) “a skills training programme” and beyond which “the government will assume responsibility for social services, including health centres and community centre grounds……..critical drainage and irrigation services for areas affected by divestment.”

These are weighty commitments but nothing more than the displaced sugar workers and their families ought reasonably to expect. All of this, however, is likely to take place in a somewhat charged political environment and it would be to the  administration’s advantage to implement its promises particularly those relating to skills retraining and the reconfiguring of the remaining estates as expeditiously since delays in these areas will almost certainly give rise to more political rumblings. 

Comments  

Oil and gas: Complexities and public enlightenment

It is hard to think of any national issue that has secured more traction with the populace over the past two years than the issue of the discovery of oil offshore Guyana and the processes involved in recovering and exploiting the commodity for the nation’s benefit.

The Small Business Bureau…going forward

The materialization of a report that allows some insights into the performance of the much vaunted Small Business Bureau in terms of its role in kick-starting a transformation in the small business sector finally allows us the opportunity to evaluate what it has accomplished so far, what some of its failings are and what sorts of adjustments/corrective measures it might take.

Implementing 20% of state contracts to small businesses

It is widely believed that if smoothly implemented and scrupulously monitored the actualization of the provision in the Small Business Act of 2004 for a 20% allocation of government’s “goods and services” contracts to small businesses could make a major, positive difference to the country.

City Hall’s helplessness in another potentially emerging crisis

The breathing space afforded City Hall in the wake of central government’s intervention to liquidate the City’s indebtedness to Cevons Waste Management and Puran Brothers and to foot the bill for services up to the end of December last year, is over.

Strengthening Guyana/Brazil economic relations

It would be entirely fair to say that successive political administrations in Guyana have, over time, continually squandered what, unquestionably, have been glaring opportunities to take advantage of the fact that Brazil, by far this continent’s largest country with the biggest economy, shares a border with us.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×