No one doubts the dire need of the city council for resources. Its current income from rates and taxes is inadequate to maintain even the basic services it now provides. The city council has had to rely on the help of the central government in the past and continues to do so. The central government may have gone along with the parking meter plan because it wanted to support the city council’s drive to increase revenue and to be itself relieved of the burden. It made a mistake.
Many still remember the sustained campaign by the then opposition against the $2,000 fee for crossing the Berbice Bridge. One of its first acts upon entering government was to reduce those fees by way of subsidy.
In the face of government support and the opposition’s token objections, it took a while for resistance to develop. When the reality of the charges hit home it triggered the formation of the Movement Against Parking Meters (MAPM), led by some prominent citizens.
