Trump’s careless talk about US ‘military option’ in Venezuela is already backfiring

LIMA, Peru — If you talk with Latin American presidents and top diplomats — as I did in recent days — you will conclude that President Donald Trump’s recent remark that he may consider a U.S. military intervention in Venezuela was a moment of monumental stupidity that is already hurting the cause of freedom in that country.

Trump’s reckless comment has already given Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro a magnificent propaganda victory. It has allowed Maduro to turn the conversation in Latin America away from Venezuela’s fall into a full-blown dictatorship, and toward the possibility of a U.S. military intervention.

Watching television in Peru and Argentina, I was amazed to see how Trump’s Aug. 11 remark that “I’m not ruling out a military option” in Venezuela has changed the conversation about the Venezuelan crisis in the region. Latin America’s most influential media, which until recently were focusing on Maduro’s break with constitutional law, are now talking about the history of U.S. interventions in Latin America.

Nicolas Maduro

And Maduro is making the most of it: He now makes his public speeches in front of a huge banner reading, “Trump, get out of Latin America!” And he uses Trump’s statement as alleged evidence that the Venezuelan regime is a victim of “U.S. imperialism.”

Days before Trump’s remark, U.S. National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster said on MSNBC that he didn’t see a U.S. military intervention in Venezuela as likely, adding that it would give Maduro additional ammunition to blame the “Yankees” for the oil-rich country’s crisis. Trump’s “military option” has since been rejected by Venezuela’s MUD opposition alliance and by Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and virtually all countries in the region.

Even Peru’s right-of-centre President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, who has been perhaps the most vocal foreign critic of Maduro, thinks that raising the specter of a U.S. invasion was unrealistic and dangerous.

When I asked him in an Aug. 14 interview at his office what the chances are of a U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, he said, “None.”

I listened carefully, because Kuczynski knows Trump better than most. As a former Wall Street banker who speaks English without an accent, Kuczynski was the first Latin American president to visit Trump at the White House, and has spoken with him several times since.

“I think the military option should be ruled out,” the Peruvian president told me. “First, because it won’t work. Second, because it’s something that will strengthen President Maduro and his inner circle.”

“In addition, it would be very risky,” he said, adding that unlike Grenada or Panama, where the United States has intervened in the past, Venezuela is a much bigger country, with much larger armed forces.

In fact, Trump’s remarks have already done more harm than allowing Maduro to shift the conversation away from his power grab. They have also fractured Latin America’s diplomatic front that was putting growing pressure on the Maduro regime to restore democratic rule.

Top Peruvian diplomats told me that the group of more than a dozen Latin American countries that met in Peru earlier this month to discuss the Venezuelan crisis is now divided over whether to adopt stronger diplomatic sanctions against Maduro, because several countries are reluctant to go forward amid the threat of a U.S. military intervention.

In addition, Trump’s remarks may have helped deflate recent street protests in Venezuela. Some regime opponents who have been fooled into believing in an imminent U.S. invasion are now holed up in their homes, waiting for a U.S. military intervention that will most likely never materialize.

Many Venezuelans who are pinning their hopes on Trump’s “military option” argue that most Venezuelans would applaud one.

But that’s not the point. The point is that whether you’re for or against it — and I’m against it — it’s unrealistic to expect it to happen.

I seriously doubt that the United States, which faces much bigger military challenges in North Korea and Iran, would open a new military front in South America that would consume much of its armed forces’ energies. It’s not likely to happen, and Trump’s empty threat has only helped give new political oxygen to Maduro’s dictatorship.


Who is crazier? The gunman, or those who let him buy an AR-15 rifle?

A senior at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School weeps in front of a cross and Star of David for shooting victim Meadow Pollack while a fellow classmate consoles her at a memorial by the school in Parkland, Florida, U.S.

By ,

UK’s Minister of Loneliness is smart move to save money, improve lives

When I read that British Prime Minister Theresa May appointed a minister of loneliness, my first reaction was to laugh.

By ,

US insults pushing Latin America into China’s arms

The gloves are off. After decades in which the United States largely looked the other way, the Trump administration has decided to confront China over its growing influence in Latin America.

By ,

World rebuffs Venezuela’s plan for sham election, but will that help oust Maduro?

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro’s plan to convene a sham election before the end of April has been rejected by all major Latin American countries, the United States and the European Community.

By ,

Bachelet’s trip to Cuba was shameful, and a blow to Latin America’s democratic left

Outgoing Chilean President Michelle Bachelet’s visit to Cuba last week was a disgrace to her legacy as a democratic leader.

By ,

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now