CCJ has made tremendous strides in 12 years

Dear Editor,

It seems to me that no other country will join the Appellate Division of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) before the retirement of the second president Sir Denis Byron in July next year. The first President, Michael de la Bastide and three other judges have retired since the court was established in 2005, and we were only fortunate to see four countries on board.

I am very disappointed at the attitude of the governments of Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and a few of the Eastern Caribbean states who are still to join. Only Belize and Dominica took steps to join Guyana and Barbados by abolishing appeals to the Privy Council thus making the CCJ as the final court.

St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Grenada failed to get the mandate from their electorates because the referenda to pave the way failed, but I am of the view that the referenda were not successful because they were loaded with other aspects like removing the Queen as head and giving more powers to the politicians.

The Jamaicans are reluctant, claiming that the CCJ was in favour of the death penalty, Trinidad and Tobago has numerous excuses and is flip flopping. Antigua and Barbuda is awaiting the outcome of a referendum which has been postponed in order to sensitise the electorates to the move. This seems like a lame excuse.

Meanwhile, the CCJ has made tremendous strides over its 12 years of existence. It has top class video conference equipment which can be used by attorneys in various jurisdictions. There is no need for lawyers to travel to Port of Spain to argue their cases they can do so from Georgetown, Belize City, Bridgetown or Roseau. The Court has dealt with several controversial cases and made a landmark decision in the Shanique Myrie case when it awarded substantial damages against the Barbados government for denying a Jamaican woman entry in Bridgetown. The judges found that the immigration officers breached the Treaty of Chaguaramas by denying a Caricom citizen entry.

I should emphasize that the CCJ is not fearful to rule against governments and has done so on numerous occasions against Belize and also the Co-operative Republic of Guyana. A very important issue will soon come up for hearing. The “term limit case” in which the Court will decide whether former President of Guyana Bharrat Jagdeo can again serve as President having completed his two consecutive terms as Head of State and government. The matter will come up for Case Management on February 6.

Although only four countries have abolished appeals to the Privy Council, the CCJ hears a large number of cases in its original jurisdiction. In fact the Myrie case originated from Jamaica which is not a member of the appellate jurisdiction. I am baffled why so many jurisdictions have not yet severed ties with the Privy Council. Unfortunately it seems as if the whole process gets so caught up in political manoeuvrings that most countries are still tied to the apron strings of the London-based Privy Council.

Yours faithfully,

Oscar Ramjeet

Around the Web

Comments