The administration signed the oil agreement when it already knew the size of the oil find

Dear Editor,

Since the discovery of oil in our territory in 2015, our media has been dominated by the news. Now it has boiled over bordering on what can be described as a controversy. The main reason for this is the agreement that the APNU+AFC regime signed with ExxonMobil. Without doubt that agreement is extremely skewed in favour of ExxonMobil. Guyana has signed an agreement that is being described by some as the worst in the world.

The issue that has people appalled is the fact that the regime signed the agreement when it had in its possession information on the huge find off our coast. So far, ExxonMobil has announced that their find is some three billion, two hundred million barrels of oil. They are still exploring.

Apart from ExxonMobil, some other companies are also exploring. It is, therefore, likely that the amount will be much more than what is already confirmed. Having had all this information and the opportunity to negotiate a production contract the administration has failed miserably. So much so that people are shocked at the quality of leadership we have.  It appears that the best interest of our people is not the most important issue for this regime. However, even with that as a given, it is hard to comprehend why they signed such an agreement, without consulting even the experts that they have employed. I say this because Dr Mangal, a Guyanese expert, has voiced his opinion in relation to the royalty agreed to by Guyana. He said that the international norm is within the 10% to 20% range. We agreed for a 2% royalty. Clearly therefore, he was not consulted as to those terms.

People are very concerned. They have every right to be. After all, they have seen that this regime collected US$18 million, in what they described as a ‘signing bonus’. Instead of putting that money into the Consolidated Fund, where it rightfully and legally belongs, they placed it in a secret bank account for more than a year. When this information was leaked and made public by Mr Christopher Ram, the regime first ridiculed Mr Ram. They went on to deny that any money was paid over to them. This blatant attempt to mislead the Guyanese public has compounded the mistrust the people have for this regime. Many believe that there is more in the mortar than the pestle.

The agreement has also practically given away all the natural gas to Exxon except for some that may come for domestic use. This is incredible.

As the criticism mounted on the regime with accusations of incompetence and corruption, the spinners tried to blame the opposition for this major debacle. Instead of releasing the agreement that they have with Eco and Tullow, they released one that was signed with CGX at a time when the state had no information of the quantity of oil in the basin. Indeed, it was an agreement to attract companies to explore. Moreover, it cannot be compared because CGX’s lease is very much smaller than the Exxon concessions. The real comparison should have been made with that exploration contract signed in 1999. And that agreement did not in any way tie the hands of this regime.

Another very disturbing aspect of the agreement is the silence on local content. Our private sector is not sure of what they can contribute and how it would benefit from this huge find. Already, we see that helicopters are being hired from Texas. A Guyanese company should have been hired for this. Exxon has already stated that the local employment component would be small. Therefore, it appears that our local input, both inside the country and in the diaspora would be extremely limited.

This regime with all the information at their disposal signed a production agreement with Exxon that has been, to put it mildly, vastly beneficial to the company and greatly disadvantageous to Guyana.

Yours faithfully,

Donald Ramotar

Former President


Lowe’s conclusion on case before CCJ was spurious

Dear Editor, In reaction to Mr Sherwood Lowe’s letter  captioned ‘Mendez has shifterd the CCJ gaze from Article 1 to Article 9 of the Constitution’ appearing in the Stabroek News of the 20th March, 2018, I would wish to submit that in my respectful recall the learned counsel for the Respondent in Richardson v Attorney General and Trotman asseverated that, in the absence of a credible definition of the terms “democratic” and “sovereignty” in Articles 1 and 9 of the Guyana Constitution, the court was required to construe these terms.

A stint in Parliament does not prepare anyone for proper management of a government ministry

Dear Editor, Our system of government is supposed to be the Westminster system, but it is not in use in Guyana today.

This society needs to embrace more liberated and progressive thinking

Dear Editor, Milton Bruce’s letter ‘The Editor-in-Chief makes all the decisions’ (SN, March 20) refers.

Realistic solutions not rhetoric are needed to bring relief to the sugar workers

Dear Editor, Regional Executive Officer of Region Six, Ms Kim Stephens, is reported in the March 19, 2018 Stabroek News, during her remarks at the ceremony to honour the Rose Hall Martyrs on March 13, 2018, “that that severed sugar workers are ‘timid and afraid’ of diversification”.

Government did not provide $68M in the national budget for the IDPAD conference

Dear Editor, It would be remiss of me not to address the Guyana Times article of March 9, 2018: ‘Govt yet to receive report on $68M IDPAD conference’, since it is either a malicious article or one in which the author is wallowing in ignorance.


Not Ready to Subscribe ?

You can still join over other 15,000 subscribers and receive FREE breaking news alerts as they happen and the morning brief featuring top stories of the day. 

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now