Several lawyers agreed to sue on my behalf but I had no stomach for another court case

Dear Editor,

I refer to Mr. Vincent Alexander’s letter on my contract termination from June in December 2011 in your June 30 edition. With due respect to the education of Mr. Alexander, I am not aware that he was ever trained as a lawyer. There is a huge omission in Mr. Alexander’s output- he left out the legal position of my contract termination as investigated by the office of the Ombudsman. Two lawyers were employed to advise the Ombudsman – Miles Fitzpatrick and Stephen Fraser in lengthy submissions that were detailed and erudite. The findings are replete with citations from case studies. They both argued that the termination was a violation of several statutes of the university, particularly, Statute 25.

I would suggest that the research of both of these lawyers be made available to UG law students because they were absolutely brilliant and available to the University to guide UG in future terminations that could save them hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. Please contact me for a copy of each. All civil lawyers need to read what these two attorneys researched.  Both lawyers unambiguously stated in their submissions to the Ombudsman that I should litigate against the university. I did not simply because it is not within my character to sue people. At the time of my contract termination, several lawyers agreed to sue on my behalf but I had no stomach for another court case given all the libel cases I was enduring at the time.

Here is an interesting dimension of the Ombudsman involvement that I never published before. I met the Ombudsman and asked him what the difference was between the Ombudsman’s position and the two lawyers’ submission. It was then I learnt that the Ombudsman does not investigate but sources out the investigation. Justice Winston Moore told me that the Ombudsman never comes to conclusions on his own but seeks the paid consultancies of lawyers so that that Ombuds-man would not be accused of personal bias. I didn’t know that. He then told me that since he accepted the detailed report of Messrs Fitzpatrick and Fraser, then it becomes the Ombudsman’s findings. I left his office with deep chagrin when I asked him; “where do we go from here? I remember his curious smile so vividly. He replied; “The findings are out there what more do you want from me.”

Sincerely,

Frederick Kissoon