Attorney Anil Nandlall, who represented opposition leader Bharrat Jagdeo in the no-confidence motion cases before the Court of Appeal, has asked acting Chancellor Yonette Cummings-Edwards to ensure that the final decisions accurately reflect his opposition to the suggestion that the constitution implied that an “absolute majority” was needed for the success of the vote.
“On a number of occasions during the course of the rulings in the Appeals at caption it was stated that all the Counsel who appeared agreed that Article 106(6) of the
Constitution captured the absolute majority formula by the language used in the Article.
