Bisram should reveal his true self

Dear Editor,

The more Vishnu Bisram writes the more he lets the cat out of the bag on his many different characters and his dependency on the PPP for relevance. For him to say that he was never a member of the PPP is tantamount to saying that people can fly. When the occasion suits him, he would claim that he is PPP and a friend of Mr Jagdeo within the Freedom House association; at other times he claims to be several things including an Indian rights activist, a pollster, and president of some shell organizations.

We found there are two types of responses from Mr Bisram. There is Type 1, where he plays to the gallery of a select group of Indian rights comrades on closed blogs.  Amazingly, his response on that blog to our thoughts was significantly different from his utterance in the independent newspapers on the same issues.  Is this a crisis of contradictions?
On the closed blogs, he entertains the likes of Basdeo Panday, claiming that he (Bisram) is an “Indian Rights Activist” and a “defender of Indian rights” and he “… will not sit by silently and allow people to be beaten and not make an effort to assist them.” But on the Linden issue on the same blog a few weeks ago he was condemning the “rights of Lindeners to protest” and asserting the rights of the police to “use whatever means necessary” to maintain law and order.

He did not think they deserved compensation. He used the word ‘thugs‘ to describe the Linden protestors and claimed that the death of three of them resulted from collateral damage.  But this same Bisram No. 1 is calling for justice and compensation for the Indo-Guyanese victims whom he claimed were robbed in Agricola.

But as he plays to a more multi-racial gallery in the independent media, Bisram No 2 stands up, while Bisram No 1 goes to bed.  Nothing in his letter to Stabroek News meets our benchmark for a response. What we can say is that by his own doing Mr Bisram has exposed himself as a phony pollster in New York and Guyana.

In the run-up to the 2011 elections, Mr Bisram published a fake poll in which he gave the PPP a possible landslide victory. When the final results were published, he claimed that the PPP was defrauded and they should challenge the results. He claimed that we attacked his “character and reputation” but proceeded to do exactly that in relation to our characters and reputations with unsubstantiated evidence.  Where is the consistency? Is there a budding Bisram No 3 in the making? For the record, this PPP propagandist is really on a fishing expedition as he tries to probe our professional backgrounds since he was way off target.

So today, we are offering Mr Bisram the opportunity to come out of the closet both politically and socially and say who he is. It is worth it. His friends and colleagues at Freedom House and at Richmond Hill, Queens in New York will recognize and accept him for who he is. No one, at least not us, will judge him for what he is, since he has a right to his choices.

Finally, Mr Bisram proclaimed that the AFC will pay heavily at the next election?  Why?  Because his ‘poll‘ says so?  This is bunkum at its best.

Yours faithfully,
Asquith Rose
Harish S Singh

More in Letters

default placeholder

The Region Five Chairman has committed no infraction in relation to his official duties

Dear Editor, Last Thursday, July 21, the Region Five Regional Democratic Council (RDC) was once again prevented from conducting its statutory meeting.

default placeholder

Is the leader of the GPSU an employer because he sits on the Public Service Commission?

Dear Editor, I note the letter from Mr EB John – ‘GRA employees are not public servants’ – in SN of Saturday, July 23.

default placeholder

GRA employees are not public servants

Dear Editor, According to the media there appears to be a misconstruction of roles, respectively of the Chairman and Board of the Guyana Revenue Authority, and that of the President, GPSU; probably because in one instance the authors are uninformed of the Revenue Authority Act 13 of 1996, amended by 16 of 2003, Clause 2 (1) which reads as follows: “Functions of Governing Board (16 of 2003) “(1) The Governing Board shall be responsible for – “a)   subject to subsection (2) the approval and review of the policy of the Authority; “b)   the monitoring of the performance of the Authority in carrying out functions; and “(c)  the discipline and control of all members of staff of the Authority appointed under this Act.” In an apparent rush to personalise a difference of positions between the two parties much ado has been made of the quoted expressions of the Chairman, as distinct from the statutory authority of that office and the Board.

default placeholder

Fishermen from Guyana and Suriname are the ones most affected by piracy

Dear Editor, I write on behalf of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisation, the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation and the Suriname Fisherfolk Organisation ‒ Visserscollectief.

default placeholder

SOCU and SARU wield a political hatchet but masquerade as law enforcement agencies

Dear Editor, Just last week, I examined the causal connection between taxation and fear and economic decline in the context of the Guyanese economy.

default placeholder

To hang or not to hang

Dear Editor, To hang or not to hang has been a topic in Guyana, the Caribbean and much of the free world for several decades.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.



Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: