Can a mediator bridge the gap between gov’t and opposition on Rohee?

Dear Editor, 

It seems that there is gridlock in Guyana because of the lack of co-operation between the government and the combined opposition forces since government proposed Bills cannot be passed if they are blocked by the combined opposition and successful opposition Bills cannot become law because the President can refuse to give his assent.

Guyana has a supreme parliament, the Higher Courts being the guardian of the Constitution, have an inherent power to look at the issues.

However there are added difficulties vis-à-vis the President’s veto powers under Article 170 even though this can be overcome, after referral, with a two-thirds majority in Parliament, and then again the President’s immunity under Article 182 of the Constitution.

It seems as if the High Court has no jurisdiction since matters of parliament are for the resolution by the law making body -parliament- and not the courts which can only interpret the laws made by Parliament.

The big controversy now is that the combined opposition successfully passed a motion of no confidence against Minister Clement Rohee. The President does not accept the motion and as a result Rohee continues in office,  but is not allowed by the opposition to speak forcing the Speaker to adjourn sittings on two occasions.

Some political analysts feel that the matter should be referred to the Caribbean Court of Justice, but I am not sure if the CCJ in its inherent jurisdiction can play a role in resolving the issue since the Executive is an independent arm of Government and neither the judiciary, another arm of government or parliament the third arm can revoke a decision/appointment by the executive.

One way is an agreement between the government and the opposition, but this seems hardly unlikely at this time since both parties are holding out much to the detriment of the country.

I wonder if an independent mediator, a high profile person or group, respected in both camps  can bridge the gap. Both the government and the opposition realize that public relations is extremely poor in the country. There is need for a better working relationship and understanding, but it is regrettable that the government has identified a former minister and a former short-term ambassador to head the public relati0on department. I am not sure if Mr Kellawan Lall is qualified and has the experience and charisma to be an effective PR person.

It also needs a race relations person because unfortunately the Co-operative Republic is still affected by race politics.

The other alternative is a snap election, but President Ramotar might be reluctant to have another poll because it is likely that his party would fail to gain as many votes they got in the last general elections.

The PPP/C is not likely to regain the government if the President persists to retain three ministers of the government who have been accused of gross wrongdoings. On the other hand it is felt that AFC stalwart Moses Nagamootoo would not be able to swing many votes if a snap election is called.

Yours faithfully,
Oscar Ramjeet
Florida

More in Letters

default placeholder

The Region Five Chairman has committed no infraction in relation to his official duties

Dear Editor, Last Thursday, July 21, the Region Five Regional Democratic Council (RDC) was once again prevented from conducting its statutory meeting.

default placeholder

Is the leader of the GPSU an employer because he sits on the Public Service Commission?

Dear Editor, I note the letter from Mr EB John – ‘GRA employees are not public servants’ – in SN of Saturday, July 23.

default placeholder

GRA employees are not public servants

Dear Editor, According to the media there appears to be a misconstruction of roles, respectively of the Chairman and Board of the Guyana Revenue Authority, and that of the President, GPSU; probably because in one instance the authors are uninformed of the Revenue Authority Act 13 of 1996, amended by 16 of 2003, Clause 2 (1) which reads as follows: “Functions of Governing Board (16 of 2003) “(1) The Governing Board shall be responsible for – “a)   subject to subsection (2) the approval and review of the policy of the Authority; “b)   the monitoring of the performance of the Authority in carrying out functions; and “(c)  the discipline and control of all members of staff of the Authority appointed under this Act.” In an apparent rush to personalise a difference of positions between the two parties much ado has been made of the quoted expressions of the Chairman, as distinct from the statutory authority of that office and the Board.

default placeholder

Fishermen from Guyana and Suriname are the ones most affected by piracy

Dear Editor, I write on behalf of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisation, the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation and the Suriname Fisherfolk Organisation ‒ Visserscollectief.

default placeholder

SOCU and SARU wield a political hatchet but masquerade as law enforcement agencies

Dear Editor, Just last week, I examined the causal connection between taxation and fear and economic decline in the context of the Guyanese economy.

default placeholder

To hang or not to hang

Dear Editor, To hang or not to hang has been a topic in Guyana, the Caribbean and much of the free world for several decades.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.



Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: